Vit Zyka wrote:
> Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Vit Zyka wrote:
>>> Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
>
> thanks for a remmembering. As I said: this mail is a suggestion to
> solve a general problem by systemic way.
>
sure, but \input cannot be redefined in a robust way because of
Hans Hagen wrote:
> Vit Zyka wrote:
>> Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> Vit Zyka wrote:
thanks for a remmembering. As I said: this mail is a suggestion to
solve a general problem by systemic way.
>>> sure, but \input cannot be redefined in a robust way because of its
>>> scanning nature;
Vit Zyka wrote:
> Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Vit Zyka wrote:
>>>
>>> thanks for a remmembering. As I said: this mail is a suggestion to
>>> solve a general problem by systemic way.
>>>
>> sure, but \input cannot be redefined in a robust way because of its
>> scanning nature; ok, in luatex we can interc
Hans Hagen wrote:
> Vit Zyka wrote:
>>
>> thanks for a remmembering. As I said: this mail is a suggestion to
>> solve a general problem by systemic way.
>>
> sure, but \input cannot be redefined in a robust way because of its
> scanning nature; ok, in luatex we can intercept things, but not in mk
Vit Zyka wrote:
>
> thanks for a remmembering. As I said: this mail is a suggestion to
> solve a general problem by systemic way.
>
sure, but \input cannot be redefined in a robust way because of its scanning
nature; ok, in luatex we can intercept things, but not in mkii
\startreadingfile ... \
Thanks Hans for your response,
Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
Hi Hans,
Jaroslav Hajtnar (in czech TeX list) encountered the problem with
\input primitive redefinition. He uses a macro package for comma
separated value file (CSV) inclusion. It redefines some catcodes and
\endlinechar befo
Vit Zyka wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Jaroslav Hajtnar (in czech TeX list) encountered the problem with
> \input primitive redefinition. He uses a macro package for comma
> separated value file (CSV) inclusion. It redefines some catcodes and
> \endlinechar before start reading such file by \input. The
