Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-16 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Dec 16, 2007 8:47 AM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > Exactly: As I nearly got mad yesterday, for I couldn't see a > difference between \, and \‚ (and my document didn't want run for > that error) I wanted to try all text-editor related software that I > could found on my machine, also a beta that exp

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 15.12.2007 um 22:07 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm: > Am 2007-12-15 um 20:58 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: > >>> But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can >>> I actually *see* a difference? >> >> Don't ask me. I've used emacs and asked it (C-u C-x =) to get me >> informatio

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 15.12.2007 um 20:58 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: > Hello Steffen, > >>> this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) and > > (thanks Arthur for the correction!) > >> But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can >> I actually *see* a difference? > ... > A

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2007-12-15 um 20:58 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: >> But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can >> I actually *see* a difference? > > Don't ask me. I've used emacs and asked it (C-u C-x =) to get me > information on the character and it told me the unicode > codepoint. I'

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hello Steffen, >> this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) and (thanks Arthur for the correction!) > But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can > I actually *see* a difference? Don't ask me. I've used emacs and asked it (C-u C-x =) to get me in

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Peter Münster
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 08:32:24PM +0100, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > > But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can > I actually *see* a difference? Hello Steffen, If you see it or not, depends on the font of the application. I can see a small difference in my email-clien

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
>> \sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR > > this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) U+201A, of course (the non-ASCII punctuation marks begin at U+2000 -- the "General Punctuation" block; the 2100 row contains "Letterlike Symbol" with arrows at the end). Arthur ___

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 15.12.2007 um 19:59 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: > Hi Steffen, > > >> on my machine, viewed with various text-editors the two sym-lines are >> identical: >> >> \starttext >> >> \startitemize[width=25mm] >> >> \sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR > > this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MAR

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Peter Rolf
Steffen Wolfrum schrieb: > Hi, > > on my machine, viewed with various text-editors the two sym-lines are > identical: > > \starttext > > \startitemize[width=25mm] > > \sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR > %\sym{i.\,V.}in Verbindung% NO ERROR > > \stopitemize > > \stoptext > > > Nevertheless,

Re: [NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi Steffen, > on my machine, viewed with various text-editors the two sym-lines are > identical: > > \starttext > > \startitemize[width=25mm] > > \sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) and this one > %\sym{i.\,V.}in Verbindung% NO ERROR

[NTG-context] ghost in data ?

2007-12-15 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hi, on my machine, viewed with various text-editors the two sym-lines are identical: \starttext \startitemize[width=25mm] \sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR %\sym{i.\,V.}in Verbindung% NO ERROR \stopitemize \stoptext Nevertheless, the first one gives an error (see below), the second goes