On Dec 16, 2007 8:47 AM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> Exactly: As I nearly got mad yesterday, for I couldn't see a
> difference between \, and \‚ (and my document didn't want run for
> that error) I wanted to try all text-editor related software that I
> could found on my machine, also a beta that exp
Am 15.12.2007 um 22:07 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
> Am 2007-12-15 um 20:58 schrieb Patrick Gundlach:
>
>>> But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can
>>> I actually *see* a difference?
>>
>> Don't ask me. I've used emacs and asked it (C-u C-x =) to get me
>> informatio
Am 15.12.2007 um 20:58 schrieb Patrick Gundlach:
> Hello Steffen,
>
>>> this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) and
>
> (thanks Arthur for the correction!)
>
>> But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can
>> I actually *see* a difference?
> ...
> A
Am 2007-12-15 um 20:58 schrieb Patrick Gundlach:
>> But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can
>> I actually *see* a difference?
>
> Don't ask me. I've used emacs and asked it (C-u C-x =) to get me
> information on the character and it told me the unicode
> codepoint.
I'
Hello Steffen,
>> this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) and
(thanks Arthur for the correction!)
> But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can
> I actually *see* a difference?
Don't ask me. I've used emacs and asked it (C-u C-x =) to get me
in
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 08:32:24PM +0100, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>
> But – Patrick you work on Mac, too – in which editor/application can
> I actually *see* a difference?
Hello Steffen,
If you see it or not, depends on the font of the application. I can see a
small difference in my email-clien
>> \sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR
>
> this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A)
U+201A, of course (the non-ASCII punctuation marks begin at U+2000 --
the "General Punctuation" block; the 2100 row contains "Letterlike
Symbol" with arrows at the end).
Arthur
___
Am 15.12.2007 um 19:59 schrieb Patrick Gundlach:
> Hi Steffen,
>
>
>> on my machine, viewed with various text-editors the two sym-lines are
>> identical:
>>
>> \starttext
>>
>> \startitemize[width=25mm]
>>
>> \sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR
>
> this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MAR
Steffen Wolfrum schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> on my machine, viewed with various text-editors the two sym-lines are
> identical:
>
> \starttext
>
> \startitemize[width=25mm]
>
> \sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR
> %\sym{i.\,V.}in Verbindung% NO ERROR
>
> \stopitemize
>
> \stoptext
>
>
> Nevertheless,
Hi Steffen,
> on my machine, viewed with various text-editors the two sym-lines are
> identical:
>
> \starttext
>
> \startitemize[width=25mm]
>
> \sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR
this ',' is in reality a SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (U+210A) and this one
> %\sym{i.\,V.}in Verbindung% NO ERROR
Hi,
on my machine, viewed with various text-editors the two sym-lines are
identical:
\starttext
\startitemize[width=25mm]
\sym{i.\‚V.}in Verbindung% ERROR
%\sym{i.\,V.}in Verbindung% NO ERROR
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Nevertheless, the first one gives an error (see below), the second
goes
11 matches
Mail list logo