Re: [NTG-context] iso latin 2 ; storm fonts

2005-04-11 Thread Adam Lindsay
Vit Zyka said this at Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:31:50 +0200: >> I'd call your st1 an EC variant, st2 an XL2 variant, and st3 some sort of >> custom expert encoding. Ultimately names aren't *that* important, but >> they can help a lot when others try to pick up and understand your work. > >Thank you Adam

Re: [NTG-context] iso latin 2 ; storm fonts

2005-04-10 Thread Vit Zyka
Adam Lindsay wrote: Vit Zyka said this at Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:23:05 +0100: enco-st1.tex - ec encoding with storm glyph extension enco-st2.tex - xl2 encoding with storm glyph extension enco-st3.tex - variants (additional glyph) for enco-st1 and enco-st2 Vit, I would refer you to this thread with

Re: [NTG-context] iso latin 2 ; storm fonts

2005-03-16 Thread Vit Zyka
Hans Hagen wrote: Vit Zyka wrote: it means that your font is not a proper math font, taco may know how to deal with this ? - \starttypescript [*] [fallback] is generaly useful. Is a good idea replaced by a (faster) setup) to move it from large type-buy.tex somewhere else? see type-def.tex: \star

Re: [NTG-context] iso latin 2 ; storm fonts

2005-03-16 Thread Hans Hagen
Vit Zyka wrote: But I get error: !Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts. Where is the problem? it means that your font is not a proper math font, taco may know how to deal with this ? - \starttypescript [*] [fallback] is generaly useful. Is a good idea replaced by a (faster) setup) to

Re: [NTG-context] iso latin 2 ; storm fonts

2005-03-15 Thread Adam Lindsay
Vit Zyka said this at Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:23:05 +0100: > enco-st1.tex - ec encoding with storm glyph extension > enco-st2.tex - xl2 encoding with storm glyph extension > enco-st3.tex - variants (additional glyph) for enco-st1 and enco-st2 Vit, I would refer you to this thread with Thomas S

Re: [NTG-context] iso latin 2 ; storm fonts

2005-03-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Vit Zyka wrote: Adam Lindsay wrote: Vit Zyka said this at Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:34:13 +0100: The question is how to elegantly switch from standard (st2) tfm to extended (st3) tfm when the glyph is not present in st2 - with preserving \rm, \bf, \it, \bi. >> basically, you declare a variant set for a

Re: [NTG-context] iso latin 2 ; storm fonts

2005-03-15 Thread Vit Zyka
Adam Lindsay wrote: Vit Zyka said this at Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:34:13 +0100: The question is how to elegantly switch from standard (st2) tfm to extended (st3) tfm when the glyph is not present in st2 - with preserving \rm, \bf, \it, \bi. >> basically, you declare a variant set for a (Serif/Sans/Mono