Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
OK, will RTFM. One final thought: I remember reading an article (by
Siep? in MAPS?) that having more than one texmf.cnf wasn't too
difficult. Would that be an option I should try? Having one which
just lets all the defaults provided by the distribution and one (set
Taco, Hans,
thanks for your reactions. And I see that Taco speaks from (bad)
experience. I have always fiddled around and tried to make ConTeXt
work in the linux distros i have tried so far (since I'm on ppc,
there were four of them: gentoo, fedora, ubuntu, suse), but have
never made any
Hi Thomas,
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Dear all (and especially the linux heads...),
I have been playing with my linux partition lately and looking at the
linux installation section in the wiki. I see there are two approaches:
- take the minimal linux distribution that Hans prepares,
- start f
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
This last step gave and still gives me some headaches (my last
attempt was with Opensuse 10.1 alpha 4), and that's where I ask for
some elucidation: texexec does not rely on kpsewhich to locate the
directory where it dumps the
texexec useses kpse but your texmf.cn
Dear all (and especially the linux heads...),
I have been playing with my linux partition lately and looking at the
linux installation section in the wiki. I see there are two approaches:
- take the minimal linux distribution that Hans prepares,
- start from TexLive
I see why these approaches