Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex questions

2010-11-18 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Thursday 18 November 2010 10:54:23 Jörg Hagmann wrote: > > syle=sans works, but not for aligned atoms, e.g. \SL{OH}; a bug? For the > time being, I can use \SL{\ss OH}. > There are indeed bugs in the use of \SL{} under mkiv. For example, one currently needs to use \SL{\small CH$_2$} rather

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex questions

2010-11-18 Thread Jörg Hagmann
Hi Alan, Thanks for the explanations. Try "style=sans". We also have "color=" and "rulecolor=". syle=sans works, but not for aligned atoms, e.g. \SL{OH}; a bug? For the time being, I can use \SL{\ss OH}. There are some problems still in mkiv, notably with CARBON, NEWMANSTAGGER, NEWMANECLI

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex questions

2010-11-17 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 16:21:49 Jörg Hagmann wrote: > Thanks, Alan. > > On 11/17/10 2:13 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > >> 1. Is there a way to define a frame offset (there is "fit" and there are > >> dimensions, but an offset would be more convenient)? > > > > [left=,top=] > > This gives abso

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex questions

2010-11-17 Thread Jörg Hagmann
Thanks, Alan. On 11/17/10 2:13 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: 1. Is there a way to define a frame offset (there is "fit" and there are dimensions, but an offset would be more convenient)? [left=,top=] This gives absolute values. I would prefer something giving me "fit + " I'll look into your oth

Re: [NTG-context] ppchtex questions

2010-11-17 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 12:37:34 Jörg Hagmann wrote: > I just started using (and liking) ppchtex, and I have a few questions: > > 1. Is there a way to define a frame offset (there is "fit" and there are > dimensions, but an offset would be more convenient)? [left=,top=] I'll look into your

[NTG-context] ppchtex questions

2010-11-17 Thread Jörg Hagmann
I just started using (and liking) ppchtex, and I have a few questions: 1. Is there a way to define a frame offset (there is "fit" and there are dimensions, but an offset would be more convenient)? 2. Is it possible to move the "\bottext" further down? It gets too close to the formula, especi

Re: [NTG-context] [ntg-context] ppchtex questions and maybe buglets

2010-03-02 Thread Hans Hagen
On 26-2-2010 15:04, Bernhard Rosensteiner wrote: ppchtex is really nice. after experimenting with it i found some buglets: Can you coordinate this with Alan? Just collect bugs and make small test files so that i can look at them in a batch. Hans ---

[NTG-context] [ntg-context] ppchtex questions and maybe buglets

2010-02-26 Thread Bernhard Rosensteiner
Hi all,ppchtex is really nice. after experimenting with it  i found some buglets:\starttext\setupchemical[axis=off,frame=on, option=test, size=medium, scale=medium, right=2000, left=3000, height=6000,textsize=medium]%textsize and option=test has no effect - why?\startchemical \chemical[SIX,SB135,DB

[NTG-context] PPCHTEX - questions and maybe buglet

2010-02-26 Thread Bernhard Rosensteiner
Hi all, ppchtex is really nice. after experimenting with it i found some buglets: \starttext \setupchemical[axis=off,frame=on, option=test, size=medium, scale=medium, right=2000, left=3000, height=6000,textsize=medium]%textsize and option=test has no effect - why? \startchemical \chemical[SI