On 2021-05-16, Hans Hagen wrote:
> now, here is something to think about:
>
> >mtxrun --script synctex --list
> mtx-synctex | invalid synctex log file %a
I've got a positive feedback, and an agenda, from Richard Koch for
supporting ConTeXt's syncing mechanism (including the PDF->TeX
On 2021-05-21, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 5/21/2021 10:50 AM, Nicola wrote:
>> On 2021-05-20, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
One thing he asked is what I was asking you: it
would be useful if there were a way to sync in the other direction as
well.
>>> You mean sort of trying to deduce from the
On 5/21/2021 10:50 AM, Nicola wrote:
On 2021-05-20, Hans Hagen wrote:
One thing he asked is what I was asking you: it
would be useful if there were a way to sync in the other direction as
well.
You mean sort of trying to deduce from the synctex file where to go in
the pdf?
Yes. You provide
On 2021-05-20, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> One thing he asked is what I was asking you: it
>> would be useful if there were a way to sync in the other direction as
>> well.
> You mean sort of trying to deduce from the synctex file where to go in
> the pdf?
Yes. You provide a .tex file and a line
On 5/20/2021 9:38 PM, Nicola wrote:
On 2021-05-16, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 5/16/2021 5:30 PM, Nicola wrote:
Anyway, I am positive that he is willing to support ConTeXt in the best
possible way...
Sure. I met him a few times. Definitely an asset for the tex community.
see? the info is just
On 2021-05-16, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 5/16/2021 5:30 PM, Nicola wrote:
>
>> Anyway, I am positive that he is willing to support ConTeXt in the best
>> possible way...
>
> Sure. I met him a few times. Definitely an asset for the tex community.
>
>>> see? the info is just there, so you can try to
On 2021-05-16, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 5/16/2021 5:30 PM, Nicola wrote:
>
>>> see? the info is just there, so you can try to convince the texshop
>>> creator to support this:
>>>
>>> -- call an external program with these arrguments (the texhop editor
>>> knows the positions as it has the
On 5/16/2021 5:30 PM, Nicola wrote:
It works just fine. Add this line at the top of your document:
% !TEX useOldSyncParser
I also have:
\setupsynctex[state=start,method=min]
I am not sure whether method=min is necessary.
normally not ...
Richard Koch, however, has been incredible,
Hi Hans and Nicola,
Thank you for your attention and your answers.
As a matter of fact I am aware that when using ConTeXt with TeXShop one has to
add on the first line
% !TEX useOldSyncParser
and then setup synctex with
\setupsynctex[state=start,method=min]
(or method=max, or just ignoring
On 2021-05-16, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 5/16/2021 2:52 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> I have been noticing for some time that \setupsynctex does not work
>> properly, at least in TeXShop on MacOS. A « filename.synctex » file
>> is created but on most occasions it does not contain many
On 5/16/2021 2:52 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
I have been noticing for some time that \setupsynctex does not work properly,
at least in TeXShop on MacOS.
A « filename.synctex » file is created but on most occasions it does not
contain many lines, and one cannot go from the PDF file to
On 5/16/2021 2:52 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
I have been noticing for some time that \setupsynctex does not work properly,
at least in TeXShop on MacOS.
A « filename.synctex » file is created but on most occasions it does not
contain many lines, and one cannot go from the PDF file to
Hi Hans,
I have been noticing for some time that \setupsynctex does not work properly,
at least in TeXShop on MacOS.
A « filename.synctex » file is created but on most occasions it does not
contain many lines, and one cannot go from the PDF file to the right location
in the source file.
Has
Hi Taco,
Synctex support should be fixed in the latest revision (3536).
Thanks very much.
I have confirmed that synctex works as before in revision 3536.
Thanks,
Akira
___
If your question is of interest to others
Hi,
For those of you willing to build and test the TRUNK of luatex:
Synctex support should be fixed in the latest revision (3536).
Best wishes,
Taco
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 21.03.2010 um 12:19 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 21-3-2010 10:53, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
with yesterdays beta (ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.20 22:59 MKIV) synctex seems to be
broken:
no response in none direction (source-pdf).
Steffen
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
On 21-3-2010 10:53, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
with yesterdays beta (ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.20 22:59 MKIV) synctex seems to be
broken:
no response in none direction (source-pdf).
unrelated to context as synctex is an engine feature
Hans
Am 21.03.2010 um 12:19 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 21-3-2010 10:53, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
with yesterdays beta (ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.20 22:59 MKIV) synctex seems to
be broken:
no response in none direction (source-pdf).
unrelated to context as synctex is an engine feature
please
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 21.03.2010 um 12:19 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 21-3-2010 10:53, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
with yesterdays beta (ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.20 22:59 MKIV) synctex seems to be
broken:
no response in none direction (source-pdf).
unrelated to context as synctex is an engine
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 16:37, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 21.03.2010 um 12:19 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 21-3-2010 10:53, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
with yesterdays beta (ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.20 22:59 MKIV) synctex seems to
be broken:
no response in none direction (source-pdf).
unrelated
20 matches
Mail list logo
