Am 2016-04-13 um 02:12 schrieb Jan Tosovsky :
> As promised, I've published a set of XSLT stylesheets for DocBook to ConTeXt
> conversion.
> Details can be found at http://doctribute.com/blog/
Thank you very much. I wikified it: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/DocBook
I found also your other blog
On 2016-02-25 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> On 2016-02-23 David Nebauer wrote:
> > On 23/02/16 06:33, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> > > On 2016-02-22 David Nebauer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Are there any publicly available solutions for
> > > > converting docbook/docbook5 to context? ...
> > > >
> > > > * dbcontext
On 25/02/16 08:45, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2016-02-23 David Nebauer wrote:
Any chance you could post your amended xslt files?
Ok, I will publish it on my GitHub account later next week (after necessary
cleanup).
Thanks, I'll watch for it. In the meantime I'll brush up on docbook xsl
customi
On 2016-02-23 David Nebauer wrote:
> On 23/02/16 06:33, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> > On 2016-02-22 David Nebauer wrote:
> > >
> > > Are there any publicly available solutions for converting
> > > docbook/docbook5 to context? ...
> > >
> > > * dbcontext - part of dblatex, abandoned ~10 years ago
> >
> >
On 2/23/2016 9:16 AM, David Nebauer wrote:
On 23/02/16 06:33, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2016-02-22 David Nebauer wrote:
Are there any publicly available solutions for converting
docbook/docbook5 to context? ...
* dbcontext
- part of dblatex, abandoned ~10 years ago
I used this way some tim
On 23/02/16 06:33, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2016-02-22 David Nebauer wrote:
Are there any publicly available solutions for converting
docbook/docbook5 to context? ...
* dbcontext
- part of dblatex, abandoned ~10 years ago
I used this way some time ago, but it required tweaks in approx 10 x
On 2016-02-22 David Nebauer wrote:
>
> Are there any publicly available solutions for converting
> docbook/docbook5 to context? ...
>
> * dbcontext
> - part of dblatex, abandoned ~10 years ago
I used this way some time ago, but it required tweaks in approx 10 xslt files
to make it compatib
On 22/02/16 19:40, Jan U. Hasecke wrote:
Am 22.02.2016 um 11:08 schrieb David Nebauer:
Are there any publicly available solutions for converting
docbook/docbook5 to context?
You may find a way with Pandoc.
http://pandoc.org/
juh
Thanks. I'll check it out.
___
Am 22.02.2016 um 11:08 schrieb David Nebauer:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any publicly available solutions for converting
> docbook/docbook5 to context?
You may find a way with Pandoc.
http://pandoc.org/
juh
___
If your qu
Wolfgang, Thomas, Hans,
On 12/18/2012 09:51 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/18/2012 12:47 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 18.12.2012 um 12:31 schrieb Roger Mason :
Hello all,
I have a manuscript to review that I have managed to coerce into
DocBook xml. I'd like to turn it into context so that
On 12/18/2012 12:47 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 18.12.2012 um 12:31 schrieb Roger Mason :
Hello all,
I have a manuscript to review that I have managed to coerce into DocBook xml.
I'd like to turn it into context so that I can mark it up in a comfortable
environment. I just tried Simon
Hi Roger,
> pandoc is not an option for me at the moment: I am currently using Arch
> Linux and have not been able to get their Haskell installation to finish
> successfully.
Have you tried to use the third party haskell repo?
They provide a precompiled package "haskell-pandoc".
[haskell]
# Arc
Am 18.12.2012 um 12:31 schrieb Roger Mason :
> Hello all,
>
> I have a manuscript to review that I have managed to coerce into DocBook xml.
> I'd like to turn it into context so that I can mark it up in a comfortable
> environment. I just tried Simon Pepping's DocBookInContext package from
On 4-6-2011 2:24, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Jun 4, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid, which
is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module and the
directives is
Op 4 jun 2011, om 14:24 heeft Aditya Mahajan het volgende geschreven:
>
> On Jun 4, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
>>
>>> Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid,
>>> which is contrary to the docbook philosophy), us
On Jun 4, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
>
>> Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid,
>> which is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module
>> and the directives is not enough, at least the cals
Op 4 jun 2011, om 11:06 heeft Hans Hagen het volgende geschreven:
> On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
>
>> Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid,
>> which is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module
>> and the directives is not enough,
On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid, which
is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module and the
directives is not enough, at least the cals tables in my valid xml docbook
document were never typeset.
Op 3 jun 2011, om 18:28 heeft Hans Hagen het volgende geschreven:
> On 3-6-2011 5:43, R. Ermers wrote:
>
>> I tried typesetting docbook with Context, it can be done, I but got stuck on
>> the cals tables and some other things. Cals tables can be processed, albeit
>> as separate documents only
On 3-6-2011 5:43, R. Ermers wrote:
I tried typesetting docbook with Context, it can be done, I but got stuck on
the cals tables and some other things. Cals tables can be processed, albeit as
separate documents only - not as part of the docbook file - and then imported
as pdf files. This was t
I tried typesetting docbook with Context, it can be done, I but got stuck on
the cals tables and some other things. Cals tables can be processed, albeit as
separate documents only - not as part of the docbook file - and then imported
as pdf files. This was too cumbersome for me, and does not agr
On 2-6-2011 7:17, Bruce wrote:
Hans Hagen wxs.nl> writes:
On 2-6-2011 12:53, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, p
Hans Hagen wxs.nl> writes:
>
> On 2-6-2011 12:53, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
> > Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
> > couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
> > finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, preparing
> > and tes
On 2-6-2011 12:53, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, preparing
and testing a mapping of even a subset of DocBook is a
On 2-6-2011 11:39, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Dear list,
I am beginning a rather tedious documentation project and will most
probably end up with DocBook. The fact is I haven't used it for any
serious work for about 10 years. Docbook In ConText haven't been
updated since 2003. Does it me
Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, preparing
and testing a mapping of even a subset of DocBook is a question of at
least a couple of personmo
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:39:46 +0200
Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Dear list,
I am beginning a rather tedious documentation project
and will most
probably end up with DocBook. The fact is I haven't
used it for any
serious work for about 10 years. Docbook In ConText
haven't been
updated since 2003
> > I have been looking at the xml manuals of Pragma. I don't quite
> > understand what you mean with the standard chain.
>
> Hans has a This Way on using xsltproc to generate ConTeXt code, which
> you can then process using context.
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-0008.pdf
http://
Quoting "R. Ermers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thank you very much indeed, Luigi.
>
> I have been looking at the xml manuals of Pragma. I don't quite
> understand what you mean with the standard chain.
Hans has a This Way on using xsltproc to generate ConTeXt code, which
you can then process using c
Thank you very much indeed, Luigi.
I have been looking at the xml manuals of Pragma. I don't quite
understand what you mean with the standard chain.
I have been experimenting before with docbook -> fo, and fop, and I came
across valuable programs like Docman and Gemdoc. But I still prefer the
On 6/7/07, R. Ermers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Has anybody found time to dive into the docbook-Context problem?
>
> The problem is that all section headings dissappear when in a given
> docbook section a table is placed. (Of course the document is validated
> against the dtd.)
it's
On 6/4/07, R. Ermers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> After having had a great deal of problems when submitting my context
> files to my publisher,
What kind of problems ?
--
luigi
If your question is of interest to other
Am 15.11.2004 um 15:14 schrieb John Culleton:
There appear to be two programs dealing with conversion of XML Docbook
documents to Context, "Docbook in Context" and XSLT. the former has
not
been updated recently and the latter has documentation dating to 2001.
I
have a potential customer who is X
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:14:49AM -0500, John Culleton wrote:
> There appear to be two programs dealing with conversion of XML Docbook
> documents to Context, "Docbook in Context" and XSLT. the former has not
> been updated recently and the latter has documentation dating to 2001. I
> have a p
34 matches
Mail list logo
