Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 25.12.2008 um 16:49 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
I'm still curious: what's the difference between cm-super and
cm-unicode (apart from size and different format)?
cm-super: type1
cm-unicode: opentype
Their main purpose is to create free good quality fonts for use
in X
Am 25.12.2008 um 16:49 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
I'm still curious: what's the difference between cm-super and
cm-unicode (apart from size and different format)?
cm-super: type1
cm-unicode: opentype
Their main purpose is to create free good quality fonts for use
in X applications supporting ma
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Am 25.12.2008 um 14:52 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
>
>> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I think it's better to use Computer Modern Unicode before you add
the cm-super fonts
Am 25.12.2008 um 14:52 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I think it's better to use Computer Modern Unicode before you add
the cm-super fonts to the minimals, I wrote typescripts for MkIV
and also one for MKII with t2a enco
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I think it's better to use Computer Modern Unicode before you add
the cm-super fonts to the minimals, I wrote typescripts for MkIV
and also one for MKII with t2a encoding. I can send you the files
if you need them, t
Am 25.12.2008 um 14:31 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I think it's better to use Computer Modern Unicode before you add
the cm-super fonts to the minimals, I wrote typescripts for MkIV
and also one for MKII with t2a encoding. I can send you t
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
> I think it's better to use Computer Modern Unicode before you add
> the cm-super fonts to the minimals, I wrote typescripts for MkIV
> and also one for MKII with t2a encoding. I can send you the files
> if you need them, the font files c
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Andrey Riabushenko wrote:
>>
>> Sample 3:
>> \enableregime[utf]
>> \mainlanguage[ru]
>> \definetypeface [russian] [rm] [serif] [computer-modern] [default]
>> [encoding=t2a]
>> \setupbodyfont [russian]
>>
>> T
Am 25.12.2008 um 13:21 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
Sample 3:
\enableregime[utf]
\mainlanguage[ru]
\definetypeface [russian] [rm] [serif] [computer-modern] [default]
[encoding=t2a]
\setupbodyfont [russian]
This one doesn't work on any of three systems described earlier.
Latin
transliteration i
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Andrey Riabushenko wrote:
> So far I have tried using pdfetex:
>
> Sample 1:
> \enableregime[utf]
> \usemodule[lang-cyr]
>
> \mainlanguage[ru]
>
> \usetypescript[postscript][t2a]
> \setupbodyfont[postscript, 12pt]
>
> This one doesn't work on any of three systems d
Andrey Riabushenko wrote:
In there a solution that will work on every of three distributions?
If anything at all works on tetex, it is accidental and unsupported.
Tetex itself is abandoned, and even in the old days the context
support in it was suboptimal.
Best wishes,
Taco
__
Dear Andrey and All,
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Andrey Riabushenko wrote:
Works on ConTeXt Minimals, but does not work on TeX Live 2008 and teTeX 3.0.
In there a solution that will work on every of three distributions?
teTeX is abandoned by te and is considered obsolete, is not it?
Is really teTeX
So far I have tried using pdfetex:
Sample 1:
\enableregime[utf]
\usemodule[lang-cyr]
\mainlanguage[ru]
\usetypescript[postscript][t2a]
\setupbodyfont[postscript, 12pt]
This one doesn't work on any of three systems described earlier. Latin
transliteration instead of Cyrillic letters.
Sample 2:
Am 2008-12-24 um 19:12 schrieb Andrey Riabushenko:
Pdftex
Preferably utf8 encoding
I had no problems typesetting a russian text simply using UTF-8
encoding with XeTeX - and of course an OpenType font containing
cyrillic glyphs (TeX Gyre).
Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
---
http
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 5:05 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Andrey Riabushenko wrote:
>>
>> I have spend three days trying to make ConTeXt show Cyrillic letters with
>> zero
>> success.
>> I have tried to follow http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Russian precisely
>> still
Pdftex
Preferably utf8 encoding
>pdfTeX, XeTeX or LuaTeX?
>Wolfgang
>> I have spend three days trying to make ConTeXt show Cyrillic letters
>> with zero
>> success.
>> I have tried to follow http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Russian
>> precisely still
>> I see only latin transliteration instea
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Andrey Riabushenko wrote:
> I have spend three days trying to make ConTeXt show Cyrillic letters with zero
> success.
> I have tried to follow http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Russian precisely still
> I see only latin transliteration instead of Cyrillic letters.
I a
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Andrey Riabushenko wrote:
> I have spend three days trying to make ConTeXt show Cyrillic letters with
> zero
> success.
> I have tried to follow http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Russian precisely
> still
>
just checked with latest luatex/mkiv-beta
and this is ok
\
I use Context Minimals on Mac OS X and its work good with following
set of commands:
\usemodule[lang-cyr]
\mainlanguage[ru]
\usetypescript [postscript]
\setupbodyfont [postscript, 12pt]
\starttext
Привет!!!
\stoptext
2008/12/24 Andrey Riabushenko :
> I have spend three days trying to make ConTeXt
Am 24.12.2008 um 16:34 schrieb Andrey Riabushenko:
I have spend three days trying to make ConTeXt show Cyrillic letters
with zero
success.
I have tried to follow http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Russian
precisely still
I see only latin transliteration instead of Cyrillic letters.
The funny t
20 matches
Mail list logo