Re: [Ntop] I just want a ntopng Small Biz Pro licence

Jari Ntopng community edition is free of charge. We have created extended versions on top of it, to collect some money to run the project. If you are an educational user, no-profit etc you can have such licenses free of charge, otherwise the community edition should satisfy all of your needs

Re: [Ntop] ntopng and IP addresses leases

I submit pull request #660. I try to separate every features I add or modify and I will submit a pull request for each feature. 2016-07-13 18:03 GMT+02:00 Simone Mainardi : > Thank you, Mathieu, please submit a pull request and we'll be happy to > consider it for inclusion in

Re: [Ntop-misc] NT_InfoOpen() failed: NT Service is not started

Jeremy are you using Napatech NICs perhaps? If so, you need to start the napatech services (/opt/napatech….) Cheers Luca > On 13 Jul 2016, at 19:27, Jeremy Ashton wrote: > > Recently when I tried to configure an additional interface I got the > following error: > >

[Ntop-misc] NT_InfoOpen() failed: NT Service is not started

Recently when I tried to configure an additional interface I got the following error: [zbalance_ipc] NT_ExplainError: Code=0x2013 Error="NT Service is not started" NT_Init() failed: NT Service is not started [zbalance_ipc] NT_ExplainError: Code=0x2013 Error="NT Service is not started"

Re: [Ntop] ntopng and IP addresses leases

Thank you, Mathieu, please submit a pull request and we'll be happy to consider it for inclusion in the main dev branch simone On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Mathieu Fourcroy < mathieu.fourc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello and thank you for your answer, > > I will contribute for sure. I have

Re: [Ntop] ntopng and IP addresses leases

Hello and thank you for your answer, I will contribute for sure. I have modified and added some features and I would gladly share them if it can be useful. Github is a best place for such things. 2016-07-13 10:28 GMT+02:00 Simone Mainardi : > Mathieu, > > You already asked a

Re: [Ntop] ntopng and IP addresses leases

Mathieu, You already asked a similar question some time ago in the same mailing list. The behaviors you described are consistent with the present implementation. If you would like to handle dynamic IP-MAC associations, then please feel free to post a feature request on github and we'll try and