+1
or Sonicwall Golbal VPN. Either way, I'd go hardware and away from
Microsoft.
--
Espi
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Don Ely wrote:
> Why can't Global Protect achieve all of your needs? Did I miss some
> requirement they can't meet?
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:25
So just a data point to consider.
Microsoft is kinda moving away from DirectAccess.
Many of the security functionalities added in Server 2016 won't work with DA.
Instead you need to be using their Automatic VPN. The endpoint isn't very
relevant, although they push RRAS.
For example, WIP
Why can't Global Protect achieve all of your needs? Did I miss some
requirement they can't meet?
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:25 PM Kurt Buff wrote:
> Arg - that should be "seeking commercial services"..
>
> And, once I bring recommendations, it might well be that we just
Arg - that should be "seeking commercial services"..
And, once I bring recommendations, it might well be that we just fall
back to a DirectAccess server in each office, with our without a
multi-site configuration, potentially with an SSP VPN appliance also
at each office for backup and
All,
1) For staff, currently we're using DirectAccess on 2012R2 as our
primary conduit in the US, with SSL VPNs (SonicWall and Palo Alto
Global Protect) as primary for our overseas offices and secondary for
the US (Sonicwall).
2) In the US office, we also have contractors/consultants needing to
http://carlwebster.com/microsoft-dns-documentation-script-update-version-1-07/
#Version 1.07 13-Nov-2017
# Added Scavenge Server(s) to Zone Properties General section
# Added the domain name of the computer used for -ComputerName to
the output filename
# Fixed
6 matches
Mail list logo