If after reading all the other replies you still want to clear the memory,
try the clearmem utility from the resource kit.
--Charles
David N.
Got it Charles, thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 8:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Command line or otherwise purge memory ?
If after reading all the other replies you still want to clear the
Does the name Jared ring a bell?
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Command line or otherwise purge memory ?
You mean my kid is going to eat more then he does now at
After installing the service packs to Win2k, the files SP1.cab and SP2.cab
are in the Driver Cache folder along with driver.cab. When Windows
discovers devices it looks in these cabs to locate drivers for the
discovered devices.I have a bunch of IBM T21 and T22 laptops that dont
install all
Since I posted the first message, I discovered that the drivers are listed
in a file called drvindex.inf which is in the inf folder. From looking at
this file, it seems that Windows looks at this inf file first to see if the
named driver is available, and which cab files to look in. So on my
Why not just put the needed information in the drvindex.inf file in your own
section at the head of the file pointing to the location where the file is
located. I think that might be easier. Are you sure you can add files to a
cab file without altering the digital signature?
Greg
-Original
I have been reading up on that today and I think you are right - it will be
easier to reference a separate cab file.The drvindex.inf file gets
overwritten by new service packs so I'll have to leave ample documentation
on what I did here. This will be a good way to include newer printer
Mmmmdon't see the point, really. SSH provides a shell that has all
of the functionality and then some, why use telnet? Am I missing
something?
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:27 AM
To: NT System
William attacked your suggestions? My, aren't we a little over
sensitive? If you feel that was being attacked, then I feel sorry for
you. Active debate is what is going on here, nothing more.
As for the Debate of Lotus V Exchange. There are arguments for both, but
the trend is to go to MS
