RE: Outgoing SQL Express

2008-05-07 Thread Andy Ognenoff
A follow up on this...a kludge way to test that theory would be to see if the CRM app performs better immediately after a reboot or SQL service restart, before SQL has been running for a while and accumulated a bunch of memory that it doesn't want to part with. - Andy O. -Original

RE: Who printed this?

2008-05-07 Thread Stu Sjouwerman
John, This might be a solution to look at: http://www.printmanagerplus.com/ Warm regards, Stu -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 1:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Who printed this? Some of our students have

RE: Voice Mail to Email

2008-05-07 Thread Roger Wright
Take a look at www.GrandCentral.com. You may be able to use it for this purpose. I use it and voice messages are automagically forwarded to my Gmail account. Roger Wright From: Scott Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 4:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: Voice Mail to Email

2008-05-07 Thread Andy Ognenoff
How did you set it to forward the voicemail as an attachment? Mine just sends me a notification to go log into the account to listen.  - Andy O. From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 4:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: Voice Mail to Email

2008-05-07 Thread Roger Wright
Log in and go to the Settings tab, Notifications on the left. Roger -Original Message- From: Andy Ognenoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 5:57 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Voice Mail to Email How did you set it to forward the voicemail as an

RE: Voice Mail to Email

2008-05-07 Thread Andy Ognenoff
Hmmm...I just thought that sent a notification...I'll have to see why I'm not getting the attachment. - Andy O. -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 4:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Voice Mail to Email Log in and

RE: Voice Mail to Email

2008-05-07 Thread Roger Wright
Ahh, I see what you mean. There's a Play button that actually links to my GrandCentral account. Perhaps this only works seamlessly with Gmail. But I would think the messages could be auto-forwarded to another email account. Roger -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: First look at 2008

2008-05-07 Thread Ken Schaefer
It's the same WinPE 2.0 under the covers. They both let you add mass storage drivers via USB. Shift+F10 gives you a command window as well :-) Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 7 May 2008 11:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: Vista administrators?

2008-05-07 Thread Ken Schaefer
Verify the UAC configuration. There are options to change its behaviour - and so you may not be running in a default configuration anymore. Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 8 May 2008 5:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: First look at 2008

2008-05-07 Thread Webster
From: Gavin Wilby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: First look at 2008 For me the killer in 2008 is the application delivery over TS Web. Easy to configure and works really well. Who needs Citrix anyhow? Those of us who don't want the limitations of TS 2008.

RE: First look at 2008

2008-05-07 Thread Michael B. Smith
I'll be the first to admit that Citrix can do lots of things that T/S cannot. And I respect your knowledge with their products. But that document has problems. Some places are flat out not true, and it even contradicts itself. And some places are truly marketing spin. From page 2: One

RE: Discounts for Non-Profits

2008-05-07 Thread gsweers
Techsoup is fantastic for non profits, Techsoup will not qualify a religious organization. Provantage.com is good for charity, there are a few others that are good, but I don't have my list handy with me. From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:41

RE: Outgoing SQL Express

2008-05-07 Thread Ken Schaefer
A couple of quick responses from SQL MVPs (who both seem to be saying the same thing): Greg Linwood writes: Queries are commonly processed using a combination of cached physical IO, so measuring the % of queries doesn't quite make sense. The best unit of measurement is page reads the two

<    1   2