That's what I was thinking. Thanks Salvador.
Joe Heaton
-Original Message-
From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 12:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: new computers
Underscored are not valid in DNS names. No FQDN for you.
DNS lookups. Underscores are not valid in DNS names.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Joe Heaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second question. Anyone know what could break using underscores in PC
naming? i.e. loc_pcname
Joe Heaton
-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche
It'll work, though. I don't want to get into the reasons or details why they
still have an underscore as it's not germaine to the question.
-Original Message-
From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 3:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Salvador Manzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/18/2008 03:18:24 PM:
Underscored are not valid in DNS names. No FQDN for you.
I have a few older servers with _ in the names. They work fine in DNS.
Internally, of course. Win2K DNS, AD-integrated
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that
Actually, they are allowed in Windows DNS and BIND since 8.4 (at least) has
had an option to support them.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
Jonathan Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/18/2008 03:25:05 PM:
DNS lookups. Underscores are not valid in DNS names.
But they will work ..
Z:\nslookup admin_nt9
Server: admnwdc001.wrk.ads.pha.phila.gov
Address: 10.64.7.53
Name:admin_nt9.wrk.ads.pha.phila.gov
Address: 10.64.13.3
In
Awesome!
Thank you.
From: Ralph Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GPO settings for power management?
Here is a link I saved a while ago but never followed up on. It is EZ
GPO
Check your Bios again. Just because it recognizes the Drive in the Bios
you will still need to change the appropriate setting in the Bios to
allow it to use the USB Floppy. At least that is what we have had to do
on some of ours.
-Original Message-
From: Murray Freeman
Nlite does too much mojo. It's like doing html with frontpage. Mass storage
drivers are pretty easy to integrate manually. If you need any help Murry
email me offlist.
--
Mike Gill
From: MarvinC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 12:24 PM
To: NT System Admin
Well, we have spent a lot of time on this, but we finally solved it, and
I thought I'd share this with everyone. When we originally created the
floppy disk with the drivers, we did it on a workstation with a standard
floppy disk drive interface. We would then attach a USB floppy disk
drive that we
UltraISO does a good job as well...
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Holstrom, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies, CloneCd is still out there, sold by slysoft. Google is my
friend, Google is my friend…
*From:* Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Thursday,
Thanks everyone for your responses, this is EXACTLY what I was looking for!
Dave
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 7:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote Desktop Users
Restricted Groups
Cheers
Ken
From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL
If it's a DC then you should have both Domain Controller Security Policy and
Domain Security Policy in Admin Tools, if not, it's not your DC.
S
From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 3:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: logging deleted files
Check the following Group Policy Objects to see if you have auditing
enabled:
1. Default Domain Controllers Policy
2. Default Server Policy
3. Default Computer Policy
Do you have auditing enabled for the Default Domain Policy? Which
specific GPO do you have this setting
We have a client that handles lots of data. I can't be more descriptive of
that because of the environment we're in. I need a good primer on MS SQL
Server failover and replication. Right now, their vendor is using log
shipping to replicate data between their main site and their DR site.
My
I do something similar, but I simply changed where new computers are put by
default. My computers now go to an OU with GPOs applied by default instead of
going to Computers, after that they can be further moved if necessary to
receive additional GPOs and/or software which I install via SCE. The
Interesting, how do you change that? I really never thought about doing it that
way since we do it so rarely.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE,
I don't know if that would be a nightmare or a revelation to find out
that my DC wasn't my DC, but alas it is. It just doesn't show either of
the Domain Security Policy's in Admin Tools. I did however find the
Domain Controller Security Policy in the GP of the Domain Controllers in
Active
We have an HP9065 MFP. I have the Postscript and PCL driver installed on our
Win2K3 server and we've been using this printer for more than a couple years
this way. Recently, when using the PS driver, you can't select Printer
Preferences or the application (all of them) simply bombs out and
I admit that my experience using WDS (Windows Deployment Services) with XP
is limited. However, it is a constant that you can use an XML file for both
instead of sysprep.inf and that winpe can inject drivers along the way. I've
always used vista as my host, not winpe, so I'm not familiar with
Point I was trying to make was ImageX is merely an imaging application with
the feature that it can mount a wim such that you can modify it later.
BDD, SIM, WDS and all that jazz can drop in files that extend the functionality
of a wim image.
All I was saying was ImageX doesn't do the driver
You shouldn't have to wait for the server to reboot for the GPO to be
updated - if you want, you can force the group policy settings to be
refreshed sooner than the default group policy refresh interval.
Thanks,
James Winzenz
Infrastructure Engineer - Security
Pulte Homes Information
Any utility available to be able to view or modify cached credentials on
a PC to other network or users' resources?
Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076 x388
_
The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts
Oh!
Yessiree bob.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
So, after the bad dat from ESET tried to ruin my life, today all my DVR systems
stopped working. Today's dat decided the exe is probably a variant of some
genetic virus.
What a farking POS! They want to ruin my life, I am sure...
jlc
Ps. And no one would return my support messages since last
I'm also running ESET but have not had any problems!
__
Stefan Jafs
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September-18-08 17:49
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: ESET Rant // ESET == The New CA
So, after the bad dat
Thanks, it refreshed the policy already without the reboot.
Looks like have what I need now.
I appreciate the guidance.
Paul
From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
When the bad dat got pushed out lastweek (and trust me, according to the
forums, many were effected) there wasn't a trace of issues in the console.
Today when it blew out my DVR's, there was not a trace in the console for any
of the clients. All the clients were updating regularly and connecting
ROTFLMAO,
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/ is down. I wonder why :)
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 4:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESET Rant // ESET == The New CA
When the bad dat got pushed out lastweek (and trust me, according
Wouldn't applying said GPO's at the domain root accomplish the same thing?
Having said that I like your idea much better..
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: new
While it's name implies that it only does something else, I beleive
the Kiwisoft syslog server is capable of receiving SNMP traps. It also
can parse received data with vbscript/jscript:
http://www.kiwisyslog.com/kiwi-syslog-daemon-features-and-benefits/
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Marc
My desktop guys (and all of IT, actually) are admins on all of the
desktops, but not domain admins, so I've delegated an OU for them to
put the PCs into. I've written a little script that joins the machine
to the domain and makes sure it goes into the correct OU at the same
time. It also makes
Nothing against Sunbelt, but try Kaspersky - we've been demoing it for the
last few weeks at my office, and it seems very nice, flexible,
well-designed, and has good management. Plus the engine and defs are fairly
widely used in 3rd party products (GFI, etc), and I have yet to hear of
their
Sorry we installed Kapersky and tried it in several environments. It
does the job, but we saw a performance decrease across the board whether
on XP, Vista or Server. Not bad enough to not use the pc, but a
slowdown none the less. Vipre has had virtually zero impact in the
dozen environments we
In addition to that, the paid verions (real cheap) can drop it into SQL or
Access for reporting.
From: Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 6:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SNMP event server
While it's name
Yes it would, but then you have to mess with blocking and filtering in some
cases. Auto moving them to their own OU works best for us.
From: David Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 6:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: new
Please note the following issue from 2002:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=319182
IE will not accept cookies from servers with invalid host names (e.g. they
contain an underscore). So, you can use these names in the DNS, but if you are
running a webserver at that address, you may have issues
Hoping catching malware will work as well, I installed NAV 2009 on
several standalone Xp or Vista machines and I was really impressed by
the no weight of the software.
Also the install was not as usual Symantec . Quich and smooth.
??
GuidoElia
HELPPC
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security
Also Avira should be taken in consideration
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: venerdì 19 settembre 2008 3.42
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: ESET Rant // ESET == The New CA
Sorry we installed Kapersky and tried it in several
Interesting... Consumer or corporate edition?
From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NAV 2009 incredibly light
Hoping catching malware will work as well, I installed NAV 2009
NAV 2009 is consumer
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: venerdì 19 settembre 2008 7.21
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: NAV 2009 incredibly light
Interesting... Consumer or corporate edition?
_
From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
