R: Outlook through VPN issues

The problem that from the source corporate server (I have no control on it) aren't ready to do it (rpc over http) The bandwith is good. The ost file remains to 0 kb . And I get also an advice that I have no permissions to open the folders! GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Nit

Outlook through VPN issues

I connect a user in a workgroup to a corporate remote domain through PPTP VPN with his domain credential. The connection is successfull an I can even map drives from remote server. I create his account on Outllok2003 sp3 (OWA works OK) in cached mode The exchange server name is well resolved gi

Re: Weird DNS issue

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Sauvigne, Craig M wrote: > ... monitors all the lab computers around campus ... > ... those machines having lost their record in DNS ... What OS(es) are the lab computers running? (You mentioned the servers, but not the clients, in your follow-up.) With Wind

Re: pop/smtp mail program

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:46 AM, David McSpadden wrote: > What would anyone recommend to sit behind and ironport and just relay to > outlook express clients? A Linux/BSD box or VM. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: Ipswitch WUG MSP edition

Sorry Michael, I meant whether there was a way to do this in Ipswitch WUG rather than if there is a way to do thisfull stop. Assessing replacements for N-Able here. WUG MSP edition seems ideal really bar the absence of any form of remote viewing, though I know that's not it's forte. From:

RE: Ipswitch WUG MSP edition

OpsMgr, Altiris, Tivoli, SMS, the list goes on and on. At this point, I'm remind that "you get what you pay for". Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.ph

Ipswitch WUG MSP edition

Anyone know if there is a way, or add-on, that allows you to remote view (control) the display of a device being monitored ? I'm slowly ruling out just about every monitor-alerting-remote_viewing package known to man. Olly -- Important notice: We have moved offices. Our new address is below.

Re: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

+1 -- ME2 On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Martin Blackstone wrote: > Where is the appearance of hacking? It looks like a malfunction to me. > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Pruitt [mailto:adminli...@bytampabay.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 7:08 AM > To: NT System Admin

Re: Apparently Google is blowing up...

Blowing up what? -- ME2 On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Rod Trent wrote: > reedracer RT @JesseNewhart: #GOOGMAYHARM also affected GMail's blacklisting > sending GOOD Email to your SPAM folder. Please ReTweet. > Sat, Jan 31 11:26:25 from TweetDeck > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint sec

Re: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

The cause apparently was human error at stopbadware.org. An entry of "/" got in without being caught, and that extends to call the entire Internet malware. Of course many people may agree with that assessment. :) More of the story at http://community.zdnet.co.uk/blog/0,100567,10012034o-200

RE: Firewall Recommendations

Well... being a Cisco bigot J, I'll throw in the ASA. You can do everything on your list except for the last two bullet points with the base license (even on the 5505 if you wanted). Actually, you *can* filter based on malicious web traffic and get user by user reports, but it becomes cumbersome

Apparently Google is blowing up...

reedracer reedracer RT @JesseNewhart : #GOOGMAYHARM also affected GMail's blacklisting sending GOOD Email to your SPAM folder. Please ReTweet.

RE: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

Apparently, Google is also harmful to your computer... http://twitpic.com/19lrs -Original Message- From: Steve Pruitt [mailto:adminli...@bytampabay.com] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 11:02 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

Re: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

The term malfunction describes observed behavior - something isn't functioning properly. The cause can be either deliberate or accidental. In this case, it might be a software change or data entered into a database. I trust Google to have pretty solid protection against global problems caused b

RE: Google warning "This site may harm your computer"

Live Search works in a pinch - and you might find it more useful. just a thought. From: Steve Pruitt [mailto:adminli...@bytampabay.com] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google warning "This site may harm your computer" Yeah, but the rest of

Re: Google warning "This site may harm your computer"

Yeah, but the rest of us don't have the complete Internet memorized like you do, Rod! ;-) - Original Message - From: Rod Trent To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Google warning "This site may harm your computer" If I used Goo

RE: Multiple engineering offices and sharing large files

DFS is great, but it has a serious limitation: If one user opens a document or file at one location it is not locked for all locations. If two users modify the same document from two different locations you will experience data loss. Check out Globalscape's WAFS (Wide Area File Services previously

RE: Google warning "This site may harm your computer"

If I used Google, I might see that, too. J From: Steve Pruitt [mailto:adminli...@bytampabay.com] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:03 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Google warning "This site may harm your computer" This morning every search we do comes back with this warning in

Re: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

Mails from ntsysadmin are carrying the warning "The sender may not be who you think it is!". Go google!. :) -Anders On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Terry Dickson wrote: > That is funny, I am having a miserable day at work and really needed that > laugh. > > > Thanks > > -Original Message---

RE: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

Where is the appearance of hacking? It looks like a malfunction to me. -Original Message- From: Steve Pruitt [mailto:adminli...@bytampabay.com] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 7:08 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night Between yo

Re: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

Between your message and mine, it certainly looks like Google has been hacked. Maybe they were hit by a disgruntled employee who left a present in case he was laid off? Steve - Original Message - From: "Phillip Partipilo" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Sent: Saturday, January 31, 20

RE: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

Apparently, their malware detection is not working for now http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5779 ...Tim > -Original Message- > From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:58 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: OT: Somebody at google

RE: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

That is funny, I am having a miserable day at work and really needed that laugh. Thanks -Original Message- From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 8:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: OT: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last nigh

Google warning "This site may harm your computer"

This morning every search we do comes back with this warning in every hit except their paid advertisements and sponsored links. Is anyone else seeing this? DNS tells me they are at 209.85.171.100, which does appear to be owned by Google, so I don't think I'm being mis-directed. Tracert returns:

OT: Somebody at google hit the vodak too hard last night

Get a load of this. It appears its not just happening to me either. Every site is harmful to my computer now! http://philz.nfshost.com/hello_google_search.pdf Heh even searching with site:google.com google is telling me that they are harmful to my computer :-) - P ~ Finally, powerful e

RE: Multiple engineering offices and sharing large files

If you have the budget, WAN acceleration devices would probably solve this issue and you could keep all the data at the home office. -Original Message- From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:48 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multipl

RE: Multiple engineering offices and sharing large files

We use SBS08 and DFS to share files across sites. You can have multiple exchange servers with SBS if you want, but with a good VPN link and RDP/HTTP as a backup you should be fine. We didn't anticipate moving large files around until I mixed up some folders and put a load of ISO's in the DFS sha

RE: RDP Question

Thanks for the reply. After reading it looks like this will not work for me. I have a dual-monitor setup at work. At home I am using a laptop to remote into our network. I only have one screen to work with. When I remote in, if I open an application that is setup to open up on my second monitor

RE: RDP Question

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925876 Monitor spanning Remote Desktop Connection supports high-resolution displays that can be spanned across multiple monitors. However, the total resolution on all monitors must be under 4096 x 2048 pixels. The monitors must have the same resolution. Addition

RDP Question

I have a dual-monitor setup at work. When I remote in from home and RDP to my computer at work I cannot see anything on my second screen. Dameware has the ability to do this but cannot convince my boss to buy it yet. Is there a way to make RDP support this? By either a command line switch or som