I grew up with them as well...
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <
michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I grew up with them, so I'm biased for them. I do realize that th
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Kim Longenbaugh
wrote:
> However, when I tried to use this subnet, with a /22 for 1024 addresses, my
> router doesn’t like it, and when creating a DHCP scope, it tries to make a
> superscope.
>
> 172.16.26.0/22
The address 172.16.26.0 is not on a /22 boundary.
I'll have to study on that for a while... :-)
Actually, it makes sense
-Original Message-
From: Steve Kradel [mailto:skra...@zetetic.net]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 4:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: subnetting question
To put it another way -- each number in an IPv4 addr
To put it another way -- each number in an IPv4 address being a 1-byte
(8-bit) number; let's suppose we're trying to set up a network for
255.255.26.0/22 ...
255 =
255 =
26 = 0001 1010
0 =
Since the mask is /22, and the first two bytes gobble up 16 bits, it
means we only c
I grew up with them, so I'm biased for them. I do realize that they are
intimidating to people that haven't.
--
Espi
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
> I can't say I agree with this... :)
>
> * *
>
> *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
>
Thanks for the info, I was afraid that was the case.
I hope your holiday good.
Kim
From: Reimer, Mark [mailto:mark.rei...@prairie.edu]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 4:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: subnetting question
Yes. For a /22 mask, you need to be on a 4,8,12... boundary. As i
Yes. For a /22 mask, you need to be on a 4,8,12... boundary. As in your subnets
below, the /23 all start with an even number and include the next number
(16-17, 18-19, etc)
As you probably know, masks are based on binary math. I can't quickly find a
tutorial for this, but many exist, as do subn
I can't say I agree with this... :)
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <
michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One thing I wish we had more of here are roundabouts. Traffi
That's just silly. Why would anyone say something like that?
BTY... How well do you know Paul McCartney?
From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Is there a way...
didn't really think you were being serious.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
wrote:
> One thing I wish we had more of here are roundabouts. Traffic IMO flows
> better, and you also get the benefit of drivers that can merge more
> effectively.
As someone who lives and works in New England, I find the idea that
"rounda
If the appliance is also the default gateway, then take the default gateway off
the network connection. That should force the email to queue.
Obviously if it isn't the default gateway then something else is amiss.
Personally though this isn't something I worry about. During the move mailbox
ph
Is it your traffic? I wasn't sure of that. Many spammers use the lower
priority because often lower priority MX's are not filtered.
From: Richard McClary [mailto:richard.mccl...@aspca.org]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 3:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail flow issue
If the lower pr
It wasn't, not when someone pulled out in front of me at about 50mph and I
was shading 140.if there'd been anything in the lane inside of me, I'd
have clipped it as my rear end started swinging about like crazy under
heavy braking
You'd think I'd have grown up by now
On 25 May 2012 20:54, Ste
One thing I wish we had more of here are roundabouts. Traffic IMO flows
better, and you also get the benefit of drivers that can merge more
effectively.
--
Espi
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Rankin, James R wrote:
> **
> didn't really think you were being serious. Tho you'd be surprised
It looks like the closest approximation in US English is "divided
highway," although this does not strictly imply anything about access
limitations, vehicle requirements, or clearances.
Whether trying to race an M6 down a divided highway is a good idea, is
another matter...
--Steve
On Fri, May 2
didn't really think you were being serious. Tho you'd be surprised at the
perceptions some US citizens have of us. I've been asked on more than one
occasion how well I know the Queen, for instance
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:2
No, here tooI was in stationary traffic tho, in my defence
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: "Ziots, Edward"
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:17:13
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: Is there a way...
Write him a ticket for Texting while dri
Drunken texting while driving on the wrong side of the street no less!
From: "Ziots, Edward"
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 3:17 PM
Subject: RE: Is there a way...
Write him a ticket for Texting while driving… ohh shoot that is only i
I'm only teasing. Happy Friday!
--
Espi
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Rankin, James R wrote:
> **
> Dunno what the US term is for it. A road with two lanes on each side that
> isn't a motorway, i.e. Not subject to traffic prohibitions, no crash
> barriers, not subject to clearway restric
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway
From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 1:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Is there a way...
Dunno what the US term is for it. A road with two lanes on each side that isn't
a motorway, i.e. Not su
Thus the looking into a "rated for higher and lower temperature" switch.
We've settled that we will get the best bang for our buck by using our existing
HP switches, a good set of fans for the cabinet, and possibly a small heater
(like what comes in some CCTV enclosures). We don't expect tempera
Write him a ticket for Texting while driving... ohh shoot that is only
in the USA...
Z
Edward Ziots
CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:27 PM
To: N
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Richard McClary
wrote:
> HERE IS THE PROBLEM – when the mail is routed through NYC, it never makes it
> to the server in IL.
We don't have near enough information to do anything but speculate wildly.
Could be a problem with your firewall rules, routing tables
FWIW, although I still use the for command regularly, if you're unfamiliar with
it you're probably better off trying to learn how to do these sorts of things
in PowerShell, IMHO
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: "Crawford, Scott"
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:59:23
To: NT System Ad
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
>>> I did call HP. They don't sell any switches that can handle
>>> operating temperatures below freezing.
>> So strap a small solid-state heater to the side of the thing ...
>
> I suspect hotter will be more of a problem than colder...
I
If the lower priority MX is not being used, how is that traffic showing up in
the firewall to which the lower priority MX record is pointing?
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 1:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail flow issue
Are yo
Dunno what the US term is for it. A road with two lanes on each side that isn't
a motorway, i.e. Not subject to traffic prohibitions, no crash barriers, not
subject to clearway restrictions, etc.
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:47
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:02 AM, David Lum wrote:
> If I unplug that cable they have no Internet. I don't control the
> firewall anymore ...
Then talk to the guy who does.
> I also don't have access to the Barracuda either :-(
Ibid.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T
You guys are still riding in carriages?
--
Espi
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Rankin, James R wrote:
> **
> Giving my other half a lift to the pub. I just got into severe trouble
> with her for racing a BMW M6 all the way down the dual carriageway. I get
> to babysit now and calm down :-)
Are you certain the sending server is using the lower priority MX record? It
bet it isn't. Check it's logs, see where it is trying to connect to.
From: Richard McClary [mailto:richard.mccl...@aspca.org]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Mail flow issue
Greeti
Giving my other half a lift to the pub. I just got into severe trouble with her
for racing a BMW M6 all the way down the dual carriageway. I get to babysit now
and calm down :-)
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Link
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 14:27:21
To: NT System Admin
On the way to the pub?
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Rankin, James R wrote:
> I am probably mistaken as I am in the car :-o
> ---Blackberried
> --
> *From: * "Rankin, James R"
> *Date: *Fri, 25 May 2012 17:55:35 +
> *To: *NT System Admin Issues
> *ReplyTo: * kz
I am probably mistaken as I am in the car :-o
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: "Rankin, James R"
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:55:35
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: kz2...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: Is there a way...
It is parsing the output again with the second For command t
Greetings!
We are trying to work out an alternative path for mail intended for our
email-to-fax system. Mail is addressed to a fax number at the fax server. The
server receives it through an Outlook Express client, renders it, and dials the
fax number in the address.
The snag is, the mail mu
Its returning the 7th (%o) token at the end.
For /? has tons of good info. I'd take a working line, like the one I gave
you, study it against for /? and modify it to see what changes so you can get a
good understanding of what's going on.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Frida
It is parsing the output again with the second For command to tidy it up
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: David Lum
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:50:39
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: Is there a way...
OK thanks. How is it not picking up
The default is SPACE and TAB
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Rankin, James R wrote:
> Yes, The specified delimiter is an = sign. You can specify the delimiter
> or use the default (is the
OK thanks. How is it not picking up the "bytes" or "time" instead?
From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 10:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Is there a way...
Yes, The specified delimiter is an = sign. You can specify the delimiter or use
th
Yes, The specified delimiter is an = sign. You can specify the delimiter or use
the default (is the default a space?)
You can echo the output out if you want to check what you're picking up
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: David Lum
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:04:47
To: NT Syste
The MAP-WS.txt is the data collection point
How the heck does that tokens line work? I get that it is stepping through the
"Reply from 4.2.2.3: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=53" line, but how the hell is it
picking out the 5th entry and dropping off "time=" part? Is that what the
delims line is doing?
I suspect hotter will be more of a problem than colder...
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Matthew W. Ross
> wrote:
> > I did call HP.
Enable secondary protection is built in to DPM. Very easy to setup and free!
(your license is for the client and not the server)
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Kennedy, Jim
Sent: 25/05/2012 16:39
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DPM recovery point limit
For otherstechnet on what Scott is describing.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb795680.aspx
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 11:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DPM recovery point limit
Again, genius. Tyvm.
From: C
Again, genius. Tyvm.
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DPM recovery point limit
You can restore from the secondary directly to original source.
From: Kennedy, Jim
[mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
I'd go with unplugging the Internet connection.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 -> 2010, disable inbound
This weekend I will be doing my last SBS2003 -> SBS2011 swing. My question is
there will be 10
If I unplug that cable they have no Internet. I don't control the firewall
anymore, only on each system itself via OS. Unplugging Internet is doable if I
have to really, but then I can't test workstation logins from their "remote
site" (it's on the same VLAN, but in a physically different locati
Anyone doing something like this yet? We use Tripwire for CIS compliance
scanning on our Windows and UNIX hosts, but Tripwire doesn't have an IIS
policy yet. We could write our own, or use DCM in SCCM for this purpose,
but if there is a tool out there that does this it will save me some work.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Kennedy, Jim
wrote:
> Does anyone know why there is a limit of 64 on the number of recovery points
> in DPM?
There's an old programming maxim: If you are going to set an
arbitrary limit on something, you should always make it a power of
two. That way it looks
If your appliance has an external and internal interface, you could also
just unplug its internal interface.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 -> 2010, disable inbound
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:38 AM, David Lum wrote:
> What service do I need to disable to allow the mailboxes to
> migrate from server to server but not receive Internet e-mail?
Exchange and Windows use SMTP for their own internal purposes, so
just shutting down the SMTP service is likely a bad
This weekend I will be doing my last SBS2003 -> SBS2011 swing. My question is
there will be 10-12hours where I will be converting the Exchange mailboxes from
E2K3 - E2K10, so I need the exchange servers to talk to each other but I don't
want e-mail being delivered until I have everything else is
Nah, BITS is the service that downloads WU in the background, the reg entries
allow you to schedule/block BITS.
Regardless, thanks for that link.
:)
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory & Messaging Services
3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, New
Found this link, that seems to do a good job of constructing a script for
installation.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/mir/archive/2011/06/04/how-to-automate-lync-client-2010-deployment-in-multi-architect-environment-using-active-directory-group-policy.aspx
Any suggestions on improvement?
53 matches
Mail list logo
