Have you tried this?
http://www.petri.co.il/forums/showthread.php?t=46538
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Architecture and Engineering Services
Tel 610-807-6459
3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017
christopher_bod...@glic.com
Thanks for the tip to your post. Checking into it and will try some of those
fixes on Friday.
J
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 7:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Uggg -- Flash 11.4 on RDS (terminal services)
Not that I can think of; I'd go to KMS as soon as you're large enough.
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 9:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: server
Obligatory:
http://xkcd.com/378/
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 5:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Why is it, in Notepad...
Emacs FTW! vi sucks! edlin rules. J
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editor_war
Carl
:) Love it! Missed that one before, somehow.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 10:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Why is it, in Notepad...
Obligatory:
http://xkcd.com/378/
From: Webster
Only if you have automated deployment tasks that depend on MAC.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 9:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: server 2012 / server 2008 r2 KMS
This begs the question - MAC vs. KMS, when should a company go to KMS
Adding KMS activation to my task list
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: server 2012 / server 2008 r2 KMS
Only if you have automated deployment tasks that depend on MAC.
From: David Lum
Hmmm how about this?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753875.aspx
If you really do have a 2000 mode name space, this will allow you to
migrate it.
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Architecture and Engineering Services
Tel
Not sure if you guys know this, but I wrote a whitepaper about whitelisting a
little while ago.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/knowbe4.cdn/Whitelisting_WhitePaper.pdf
Have no product to sell you, and no dog in this fight, but I have been inside
the AV world for a while :-)
Stu
-Original
That's the thing there is no names space created yet. I could try creating
one then migrating it
I was also just reading through the dsutil.exe commands and see that I can
specify v2 (2008 Mode) if I create via the command line. Going to try that
next to see if it will let you do it that
Very nice. All well stated.
-Original Message-
From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: My sons IT learning..
Not sure if you guys know this, but I wrote a whitepaper about whitelisting a
Did you raise the Domain functional level to 2008 or 2008 R2 ? Only if you
don't have any other 2003 DC's FYI..
Greg Sweers
CEO
ACTS360.comhttp://www.acts360.com/
P.O. Box 1193
Brandon, FL 33509
813-657-0849 Office
813-758-6850 Cell
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:cbusitl...@gmail.com]
Sent:
No you're right but we are receiving a lot of alerts about what the AV is
detecting... :o)
White listing combine with an AV (not from the same source), plus a local
firewall should start to be a valid config. I don't beleived in a single
solution...
De :
I'd tend to be wary also, but I have done similar things. It's always worked
ok, but it just seems a little sketchy and makes me nervous. What I've done
lately instead is move some of the content to a different drive/lun and then
mount that as a folder in the current namespace instead of a
That's distressing, I must say.
Not only doesn't the unit support LUNs larger than 1.99tb, they don't
support Dynamic Disks.
I'm loving my Lefthand more and more - I've got a 3tb LUN on it, and
have no problems at all.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
I must investigate that approach.
I'm also going to have to look at grooming the files - a most
unpleasant chore, leading to much anguish and gnashing of teeth on the
part of the users.
Kurt
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
I'd tend to be wary also,
It's not an EMC limitation...
http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01812132lang=encc=ustaskId=101prodSeriesId=3936136prodTypeId=12169
- Sean
On Oct 4, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
That's distressing, I must say.
Not only doesn't
I guess I wasn't clear...
The limitation on the size of the LUN is the thing I'm not happy about.
I don't care a bit about Dynamic disks, except insofar as they would
help me overcome the 1.99tb limitation on LUNs on the EMC. The
Lefthand wasn't crippled with that limitation on LUN size.
I
No worries, looking back I think you were perfectly clear.
I believe you're running into a SCSI 2 limitation. I'm not sure if its a result
of their decision to marry FLARE with DART to support multiple block level
protocols on the same array. I'm pretty sure that limitation doesn't exist for
As I said, I don't know - but it wasn't revealed when we made the
purchase decision.
It's a bit ironic, too - the new manager, because of previous
experience with some of their bigger units, was all hot to go with
EMC, and I didn't see a need to move away from the Lefthand.
I haven't pressed him
EMC is one of those companies everyone loves to hate. I've got a fair
amount of experience with their Clariion line, and they were all well
performing and reliable arrays. With that said, they were fairly expensive
to operate (especially beyond the 3 year mark) and EMC is not afraid to
nickel and
I'm using the MS iSCSI initiator for these disks on our file server,
and I just moved the machine over to vCenter on a very new Essentials
Plus cluster from an ESX 3.5 standalone machine, and before that it
had been P2V'ed from a physical box.
I've whined to CDW about the VNXe, but not from a
I actually just went through a similar process not too long ago. I moved a
volume from W2k3 host to a W2k8R2 host that served up user home
directories. The volume was presented via fiber channel but the underlying
considerations are largely the same. You're spot on about recreating the
shares and
View - Status Bar gives you the current line number in Notepad. You can use
Ctrl+G to go to a specific line.
Cheers
Ken
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2012 7:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Why is it, in Notepad...
Legacy stuff I
Ashamed to admit I didn't know that. Thanks for the tip!
On Oct 4, 2012 9:49 PM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
View - Status Bar gives you the current line number in Notepad. You can
use Ctrl+G to go to a specific line.
** **
Cheers
Ken
** **
*From:* James
25 matches
Mail list logo
