Re: [Robo]copy performance issue

lol, thanks :-) I certainly wasn't implying anything to that effect - but things like this have been reported to the list enough times that I should have recognized that I was dealing with he same issue. Above everything else, I'm suprised at the vendor that installed the equipment - as they were

Re: [Robo]copy performance issue

I wouldn't be too ashamed...happens to the best of us. :) On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm terribly ashamed of myself for not thinking of it myself, but you > guys were of course right that it was a duplex issue on the port. > > Thanks for the

Re: [Robo]copy performance issue

I'm terribly ashamed of myself for not thinking of it myself, but you guys were of course right that it was a duplex issue on the port. Thanks for the nudge! -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ ~

Re: [Robo]copy performance issue

Now that you and Michael mention it - it does ring of that type of an issue. I need to confirm the settings on the switch port. Thanks! On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:40 PM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sounds like a speed/duplex mismatch. I would try to hard code both the > servers and the

Re: [Robo]copy performance issue

d the switch ports? > > Regards, > > Michael B. Smith > MCSE/Exchange MVP > http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:27 PM > To: NT System Admin Issue

Re: [Robo]copy performance issue

sounds like a speed/duplex mismatch. I would try to hard code both the servers and the switch to 100 or 1000 /full if that does not work set the servers to auto, I have seen problems on some server NIC's and switches when both are set to 100/Full and network transfers are slow. Micheal Espinola

RE: [Robo]copy performance issue

, May 20, 2008 12:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: [Robo]copy performance issue Hi everyone, I"m seeing something peculiar with robocopy, and quite the opposite of anything I have seen before or would expect. I am performing a simple robocopy mirror copy between two servers. When

[Robo]copy performance issue

Hi everyone, I"m seeing something peculiar with robocopy, and quite the opposite of anything I have seen before or would expect. I am performing a simple robocopy mirror copy between two servers. When these servers were attached to different uplinked switches, copy time/performance was as expect