: smb firewall recommendation
I use SonicWall for anti-malware and have found their support to be very
good.
TVK
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: smb firewall
a beautiful line...
Original Message
Subject: smb firewall recommendation
From: Jimmy Tran jt...@teachtci.com
Date: Mon, January 14, 2013 10:32 am
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Hi All,
I'm in the market for a firewall for a small
I've got a dozen TZ series Sonicwalls across the country all connected to
my main office. They run great.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jimmy Tran jt...@teachtci.com wrote:
Hi All,
** **
I’m in the market for a firewall for a small office with les that 15
users. I was looking
:
Hi All,
** **
I’m in the market for a firewall for a small office with les that 15
users. I was looking at the Sonicwall TZ series but people are telling me
to stay away from Sonicwall. Has the product improved? Any other
recommendations. Would like the UTM features
to a FortiGate. I really like it, so I recommend that
you check them out as well.
Last, you can always go really cheap and get pfSense or ClearOS, or some other
software-based firewall.
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: Jimmy Tran
[mailto:jt...@teachtci.com
I use SonicWall for anti-malware and have found their support to be very good.
TVK
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: smb firewall recommendation
I've used Sonicwalls
Thanks for the input guys and gals.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 9:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: smb firewall recommendation
I use SonicWall for anti-malware and have found their support to be very
: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: netsh advfirewall firewall to disable a rule - RESOLVED
Glad to help! :)
I was about to send you my powershell code that does this.
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 8:52 AM
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: Listing Windows Firewall Rules
Using Microsoft PowerShell
Based on the email thread from earlier this week, I wrote a very short (for me)
article.
http://carlwebster.com/listing-windows-firewall-rules-using-microsoft-powershell/
The code may not be up
...@smithcons.com]
Subject: RE: Listing Windows Firewall Rules Using Microsoft PowerShell
Very nice.
Don't forget about compare-object.
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Subject: Listing Windows Firewall Rules Using Microsoft PowerShell
Based on the email thread from earlier this week, I wrote
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Listing Windows Firewall Rules Using Microsoft PowerShell
I will have to look that up (probably for the 10th time) later today.
My old-timers is kicking in with my bday coming up soon. J
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http
I was 40 once.
ONCE
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Listing Windows Firewall Rules Using Microsoft PowerShell
Gratz on your Bday coming up, I just hit 40, gosh am I feeling it now.
Z
Edward E
LOL...
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Listing Windows Firewall Rules Using
Firewall Rules Using Microsoft PowerShell
I was 40 once.
ONCE
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Listing Windows Firewall Rules Using Microsoft PowerShell
Gratz on your Bday coming up, I just hit 40, gosh am I
[mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Subject: Re: Listing Windows Firewall Rules Using Microsoft PowerShell
I've been 40 nearly a dozen times now!
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership for Strong Families
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Subject: RE: Listing Windows Firewall Rules
@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: list Windows Firewall rules
Trying to find a way to list all the enabled inbound and outbound firewall
rules on a Server 2008 R2 Sp1 server. I have tried all the examples from netsh
advfirewall firewall show rule but not getting anything returned.
I am
firewall
rules on a Server 2008 R2 Sp1 server. I have tried all the examples from
netsh advfirewall firewall show rule but not getting anything returned.
I am installing XenApp 6.5 and needing to compare the Windows Firewall Rules
between a XenApp 6.5 server configured as a Collector
Are y'all wanting me to actually do some work here! :)
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: list Windows Firewall rules
can you pull them directly from
That is a start. Strange that the example show to use “name=any” but it is
actually “name=all”.
I just found this,
http://blogs.technet.com/b/jamesone/archive/2009/02/18/how-to-manage-the-windows-firewall-settings-with-powershell.aspx
, and will see what it can do for me.
Thanks
Carl
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
If I had more time, this email would have been shorter. J
There you go, quoting dead French philosophers again.
Kurt
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Here is the code I finally used.
Function Get-FireWallRule
{
Param ($Name, $Direction, $Enabled, $Protocol, $profile,
$action, $grouping)
$Rules=(New-object –comObject HNetCfg.FwPolicy2).rules
If ($name) {$rules= $rules | where-object
You're going to need to allow Remote Desktop (TCP-in) in the Inbound
Rules as part of your firewall GPO.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
We set up a GPO that turned on the Windows firewall for our
workstations, and encountered several problems
Just added that. We'll see if that fixes the problem.
The thing is, there's a long standing GPO (admin template) that allows
RDP, and it's either being ignored or overridden. That's pretty
puzzling.
Also, the new GPO controlling the firewall explicitly turns off the
firewall for the Domain
What versions are the clients? The Win7 host firewall does not AFAIK
share any settings or behaviors with its predecessors.
I'd definitely prefer to leave the firewall on, with an allow rule for
RDP (and probably RPC remote management) in the Domain profile.
--Steve
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:14
I too would prefer to leave the firewall on, and just add in the rule
for access, but I'm being overruled by management.
I found the problem, however.
I moved one machine out of the OU where the GPOs for workstations are
applied, and everything behaved as expected. This led me to review the
GPOs
]
Sent: Saturday, 21 July 2012 2:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 and firewall or DMZ.
We have discussed this before but I have lost my notes.
I have 1 Exchange Standard 2003 server that sits behind my firewall. The
auditors want it in the DMZ but as discussed here
it part of
the existing organization. What you'll do is make it a front-end server which
means that it will not host an information store, just serve up
OWA/ActiveSync/POP/IMAP. Then what you'll do is make this accessible via HTTPS
to the Internet through your firewall (or ideally an ISA/TMG
Is this normal behaviour?
I notice on some Windows 2008 R2 boxes, which have the Windows firewall
enabled by default, and in some cases, the firewall settings are managed by
group policy, if I STOP the Windows Firewall service (from services.msc),
the server is no longer accessible
http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/03/24/stopping-the-windows-authenticating-firewall-service-and-the-boot-time-policy.aspx
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:42 PM, jesse-r
I've seen that before, I opt to just leave it on but with it effectively
disabled by the GPO settings
--Original Message--
From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com
To: NT System Admin Issues
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 2008R2 firewall ... grr.
Sent: 9 Jul 2012 17:42
Is this normal
Yes.
ALL IP communication goes through the firewall in server 2008 r2. If you stop
the firewall, no IP communication can occur. In my opinion, they shouldn't
allow you to stop the service.
-Original Message-
From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com [mailto:jesse-r...@wi.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, July
That is by design. If you DISABLE the service before stopping it you'll have
much better results :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com [mailto:jesse-r...@wi.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 9:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 2008R2 firewall ... grr
Don't stop the firewall in 2008r2, bad things happen (like networking
stops). Control it via policy or cmdline (netsh).
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee126090(v=WS.10).aspx
[image: Important]Important Because the Windows Firewall service applies
service hardening rules to standard
Very good link , Andrew
Guido Elia
HELPPC - HELPPC SERVICE
Da: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Inviato: lunedì 9 luglio 2012 18.43
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: Re: 2008R2 firewall ... grr.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/networking/archive/2009/03/24
No you will NOT. RDS and XenApp will NOT install if the Firewall service
is disabled.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com http://www.carlwebster.com/
On 7/9/12 9:52 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
That is by design. If you DISABLE
I meant for testing, not run-and-maintain.
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 10:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2008R2 firewall ... grr.
No you will NOT. RDS and XenApp will NOT install if the Firewall service
the firewall in server 2008 r2. If you
stop the firewall, no IP communication can occur. In my opinion, they
shouldn't allow you to stop the service.
-Original Message-
From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com [mailto:jesse-r...@wi.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 12:42 PM
To: NT System Admin
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
ALL IP communication goes through the firewall in server 2008 r2. If you
stop the firewall, no IP communication can occur. In my opinion, they
shouldn't allow you to stop the service.
I am of the opinion
Thanks, I didn't know that R2 had a block mode that is trigged when the
firewall service is stopped. Appreciate the quick link.
Original Message:
-
From: Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:43:23 -0400
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re
Subject: Re: 2008R2 firewall ... grr.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.com
wrote:
ALL IP communication goes through the firewall in server 2008 r2. If
you stop the firewall, no IP communication can occur. In my opinion,
they shouldn't allow you to stop
]
*Sent:* Saturday, May 12, 2012 7:26 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* SOHO Firewall
** **
I have been asked for a firewall in a SB with only workgroup server with
following features:
** **
1. 100mbps bandwidth
2. Web control (possibly per user)
3
: Saturday, May 12, 2012 7:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SOHO Firewall
I have been asked for a firewall in a SB with only workgroup server with
following features:
100mbps bandwidth Web control (possibly per user) Easy to configure 25 users
(no more)
TIA
Guido Elia
HELPPC - HELPPC
Firewall
Look at the Fortinet devices...
-ASB: http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
Sent from my Motorola Droid RAZR
On May 12, 2012 10:30 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.itmailto:g...@enter.it wrote:
I have been asked for a firewall in a SB with only workgroup server with
following features:
1. 100mbps
: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 7:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SOHO Firewall
I have been asked for a firewall in a SB with only workgroup server with
following features:
100mbps bandwidth Web control (possibly per user) Easy to configure 25 users
Look at cyberoam
We just started selling them powerfully little boxes
On Saturday, 12 May 2012, HELP_PC wrote:
I have been asked for a firewall in a SB with only workgroup server with
following features:
** **
1. 100mbps bandwidth
2. Web control (possibly per user
...@mail.cvhp.orgmailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 7:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SOHO Firewall
I have been asked for a firewall in a SB with only workgroup server with
following features:
1. 100mbps bandwidth
2. Web control
:_e({}, 'cvml',
'mwal...@mail.cvhp.org');
** **
*From:* HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'g...@enter.it');]
*Sent:* Saturday, May 12, 2012 7:26 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* SOHO Firewall
** **
I have been asked for a firewall in a SB
Look at the Fortinet devices...
-ASB: http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
Sent from my Motorola Droid RAZR
On May 12, 2012 10:30 AM, HELP_PC g...@enter.it wrote:
I have been asked for a firewall in a SB with only workgroup server with
following features:
** **
1. 100mbps bandwidth
I'm in no way a networking kind of guy, so please excuse this slightly
noob-ish question...if you need to open up a firewall for http/s and BITS
traffic, since they both work on port 80 (or 443), do you just need to open
the one port? I can't seem to find a definitive answer via the Google-God
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: 05-09-12 10:37 AM
Subject:Firewall-y stuff
I'm in no way a networking kind of guy, so please excuse this slightly
noob-ish question...if you need to open up a firewall for http/s and BITS
traffic, since they both work on port 80 (or 443), do you
, 2012 10:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Firewall-y stuff
I'm in no way a networking kind of guy, so please excuse this slightly
noob-ish question...if you need to open up a firewall for http/s and
BITS traffic, since they both work on port 80 (or 443), do you just need
to open
Are we talking a regular firewall or the Windows firewall on a server?
Z
Edward Ziots
CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:53 AM
of America*
*
**www.guardianlife.com* http://www.guardianlife.com/
From:James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com
To:NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date:05-09-12 10:37 AM
Subject:Firewall-y stuff
Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
** **
*From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:36 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Firewall-y stuff
** **
I'm in no way a networking kind of guy, so please excuse this slightly
noob-ish
Bit of both. We need a Windows 2008 R2 Server to talk to Windows 7 clients
that are on the other side of a firewall, using SQL and BITS traffic
On 9 May 2012 15:54, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
Are we talking a regular firewall or the Windows firewall on a server? ***
*
** **
Z
, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall-y stuff
Bit of both. We need a Windows 2008 R2 Server to talk
ezi...@lifespan.org
** **
*From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:05 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Firewall-y stuff
** **
Bit of both. We need a Windows 2008 R2 Server to talk to Windows 7 clients
NO worries..
Z
Edward Ziots
CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall-y stuff
That's pretty
May 2012 11:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall-y stuff
Bit of both. We need a Windows 2008 R2 Server to talk to Windows 7 clients that
are on the other side of a firewall, using SQL and BITS traffic
On 9 May 2012 15:54, Ziots, Edward
ezi...@lifespan.orgmailto:ezi
garcia
[mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Thu, 03 May 2012
13:20:13 -0700
Subject: Any experince with Netgate m1n1wall 2D3 / 2D13
Firewall
Anyone in the list have had expenrince with Netgate m1n1wall 2D3 / 2D13
firewall
-software.com]
Sent: Thu, 03 May 2012
13:20:13 -0700
Subject: Any experince with Netgate m1n1wall 2D3 / 2D13
Firewall
Anyone in the list have had expenrince with Netgate m1n1wall 2D3 / 2D13
firewall...
Thanks
--
Justin
IT-TECH
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T
).
As for if it will be enough for you needs, it depends _on_ _your_ _needs_. If
you believe the marketing speak on their webpage, this unit running pfSense can
handle 85Mbps of traffic, unless you try to use pfSence's VPN Features (they
list those speeds as well).
Trying to make a firewall for a small building
Looking or input here. Have a customer with 200-250 devices (95% are Mac,
5% PC based) and a 40Mb internet pipe. They need a firewall replacement
and a decent web-filter. I'm considering UTM options such as the
Watchguard XTM 510. I looked at SonicWall, but they recommended a NSA3500
model
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:53, jesse-r...@wi.rr.com
jesse-r...@wi.rr.com wrote:
Looking or input here. Have a customer with 200-250 devices (95% are Mac,
5% PC based) and a 40Mb internet pipe. They need a firewall replacement
and a decent web-filter. I'm considering UTM options
30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, jesse-r...@wi.rr.com jesse-r...@wi.rr.com
wrote:
Looking or input here. Have a customer with 200-250 devices (95% are Mac,
5% PC based) and a 40Mb internet pipe. They need a firewall replacement
and a decent web-filter. I'm considering UTM options
. They need a firewall replacement
and a decent web-filter. I'm considering UTM options such as the
Watchguard XTM 510. I looked at SonicWall, but they recommended a NSA3500
model which was much more expensive than the Watchguard. Untangle is
another nice UTM, but doesn't handle Mac stuff
Firewall? No problem. Anything can do this.
Web filter? It depends: what do you want? Do you want users to have to
authenticate somehow? Do you need tiers of web-blocking? (Aka, User group A can
reach xyz.com, but user group B are blocked.) What kind of reporting do you
need? Do you need
The outstanding silence speaks volumes.
--
Espi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Watch out for the thing shutting down your Internet when it has passed X
bytes. We are fighting that a $dayjob% at the moment.
Jon
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:54 PM,
web services without one these days ..
a
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: 31 January 2012 08:48
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Barracuda Firewall NG
The outstanding silence speaks volumes.
--
Espi
On Mon, Jan
I use a couple of their Spam/Virus firewalls for email. Very happy with it.
BF
From: Alan Davies [mailto:adav...@cls-services.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 4:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Barracuda Firewall NG
We use their WAFs. Very solid product, very enthusiastic
I've got an NSA 3600. Uptime is at over 400 days. I've got my remote
sites stocked with TZ180, 190, 210's. They are rock solid. Great VPN
capability.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Carol Fee c...@massbar.org wrote:
Anyone using, and if so, which model, and how do you like it ? TIA
Anyone using, and if so, which model, and how do you like it ? TIA
Carol Fee
Network Administrator
Massachusetts Bar Association
20 West St.
Boston, Ma 02110
617-338-0623
c...@massbar.org
[cid:image003.jpg@01CCDF67.6B8EFBE0]
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Watch out for the thing shutting down your Internet when it has passed X
bytes. We are fighting that a $dayjob% at the moment.
Jon
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Carol Fee c...@massbar.org wrote:
Anyone using, and if so, which model, and how do you like it ? TIA
** **
*Carol Fee*
Hi Folks,
I know this have been covered many times before, but I can't find anything in
the archive about all in one firewalls.
I currently use Fortinet firewalls at my HQ and VPN sites. I like that they
have a variety of features in one box (virus scanning, general firewall,
content
currently use Fortinet firewalls at my HQ and VPN sites. I like that
they have a variety of features in one box (virus scanning, general
firewall, content filtering, etc) in a single device, and that's good for
we non-profits.
They work well, but renewals are due soon, the devices are old
Keep what you have. Don't pay annual support for less mission critical
remote offices? Keep a spare on-hand.
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: All in one firewall
Hi Folks,
I know this have been covered
pay annual support for “less mission critical”
remote offices? Keep a spare on-hand.
** **
*From:* Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:59 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* All in one firewall
** **
Hi Folks,
I know
You are correct about that. Good point. My bad.
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: All in one firewall
That is a viable strategy for the hardware, but it doesn't keep the virus and
content
many times before, but I can't find anything
in the archive about all in one firewalls.
I currently use Fortinet firewalls at my HQ and VPN sites. I like that
they have a variety of features in one box (virus scanning, general
firewall, content filtering, etc) in a single device, and that's
firewalls.
I currently use Fortinet firewalls at my HQ and VPN sites. I like that
they have a variety of features in one box (virus scanning, general
firewall, content filtering, etc) in a single device, and that's good
for we non-profits.
They work well, but renewals are due soon, the devices are old
in one box (virus scanning, general
firewall, content filtering, etc) in a single device, and that's good for
we non-profits.
They work well, but renewals are due soon, the devices are old and due
for replacement. Before I just buy the next model, anyone have any
recommendations for all-in-one
the LAN or spamming through his
firewall. Logs should show this. Blocking port 25 outbound may solve this
problem.
Almost anything in the right class will handle what he needs, once he
figures out what's happening.
Heck, even a simple pfsense box on decent hardware will do what he wants.
+1
+1 on the ASA here, too.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall/Router recommendations
+1 on the ASA no experience with NetScreen
Jon
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Erik Goldoff egold
Good Afternoon, list members.
I would like to know what are some of your recommendations for a
Router/Firewall. Some info of our current situation:
We currently use a Linux-based firewall (ClearOS for those curios). It has
served us well over the years. Very recently, it has begun
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Firewall/Router recommendations
Good Afternoon, list members.
I would like to know what are some of your recommendations for a
Router/Firewall. Some info of our current situation:
We currently use a Linux-based firewall (ClearOS for those curios). It has
served
! '
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 5:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Firewall/Router recommendations
Good Afternoon, list members.
I would like to know what are some of your recommendations
.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 4:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Firewall/Router recommendations
Good Afternoon, list members.
I would like to know what are some of your recommendations for a
Router
Look at Fortinet's Fortigate products. Very nice with filtering, etc. available.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 2:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Firewall/Router recommendations
Good Afternoon, list
...@lrlaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Firewall/Router recommendations
Look at Fortinet's Fortigate products. Very nice with filtering, etc.
available.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent
that the devices have Intrusion Prevension, content filtering, a/v
scanning, and firewall all-in-one. Makes for good use of money for us
non-profits.
Erik Goldoff 10/05/11 8:01 PM
Heard good about them too, just no personal experience.
Fortinet was formed by former Netscreen folks IIRC.
Erik
Don't look for a new firewall right now.
Do figure out why the response is so crappy after having been fine for so long.
I take that as a signal that something has drastically changed in your
environment.
Can you characterize your current traffic? In particular, look for
indications that you're
I'd say the OP needs to both figure out the root cause, *and* buy a
new firewall as the vendor's support program's been tried and found
wantin'.
--Steve
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't look for a new firewall right now.
Do figure out why
wants.
Kurt
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 21:04, Steve Kradel skra...@zetetic.net wrote:
I'd say the OP needs to both figure out the root cause, *and* buy a
new firewall as the vendor's support program's been tried and found
wantin'.
--Steve
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b
Any Checkpoint firewall admins online today? I have a Checkpoint box
that's down, need some help. Can offer some coin in return for help.
Please email me offline, thanks.
Jesse
mail2web - Check your email from the web
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
So ideally in your opinion the firewall would effectively give
each VLAN (each VLAN defined by 802.1Q tags) it's own
DHCP scope and thus their own IP settings, correct?
More or less.
I would separate your desired access
Yep, what you describe is exactly what I was envisioning, thanks! (BTW Dell
also calls it tagging). Now to decide on a firewall. I called my client last
night and she was already onboard with my thinking go ahead and buy it or send
me a link and I'll order it.
I love clients that trust you
And now I need to choose a firewall. Holy crap there are a multitude of
options, not the least of which are the various UTM (Unified Threat Management)
options and reporting options.
What kind of features do you guys find are key and are there any features you
thought you'd use but really
Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
And now I need to choose a firewall. Holy crap there are a multitude of
options, not the least of which are the various UTM (Unified Threat
Management) options and reporting options.
What kind of features do you guys find are key and are there any features
you
The features I find that I use the most are:
- Firewall / VPN
- IPS
- .
- .
- .
- AV / Content Filtering
* *
*ASB* *http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:38 AM, David Lum david
Are you saying that av/content filtering is you least important criteria of all
on a FW? Or that's it's the bottom of your must haves?
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SMB firewall (was RE: VLAN N00b
1 - 100 of 806 matches
Mail list logo
