combination of technologies and people you need to meet it.
** **
Cheers
Ken
** **
*From:* David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
*Sent:* Wednesday, 13 March 2013 1:40 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Keeping 550+ systems maintained
** **
Scenario
Would Windows Intune be a possibility for those remote devices?
From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:loonyto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained
You could look at direct access
As long as the remote
Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained
Would Windows Intune be a possibility for those remote devices?
From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:loonyto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained
You could look at direct
, YMMV, etc. Jon
From: david@nwea.org
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:04:24 +
I think we have the tools needed (We have KACE that can sit in the DMZ, we have
an ePO server that agents can check
to confirm the above
Dave
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained
I think you need to know what your requirements are.
How do you define up to date? e.g.
- How quickly
, 14 Mar 2013 20:23:57
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems
maintained
Excellent questions Ken, thanks. Up to date at this point means
1. Current (within 1
System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained
Excellent questions Ken, thanks. Up to date at this point means
1. Current (within 1 day) of anti-virus signatures
2. Have the latest Acrobat/Java/Firefox/Chrome updates within two weeks
3. Successful backups (we use
it.
Cheers
Ken
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2013 1:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Keeping 550+ systems maintained
Scenario:
* 550 Windows workstations, with 100+ of them remote.
* Active Directory (W2K8R2 and W2K3 DCs
: 03/12/2013 10:41 AM
Subject:Keeping 550+ systems maintained
Scenario:
· 550 Windows workstations, with 100+ of them remote.
· Active Directory (W2K8R2 and W2K3 DCs).
· Windows 7 and Windows XP.
· Users are local admins.
· Some remote users
In my experience the Users are local admins. bullet is going to add to
the manpower hours. You probably already know this first hand and unable to
change it, but it does add to the manpower requirements.
We have roughly the same number of workstations, and our helpdesk breaks
down like this
1 FTE
: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 7:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained
Question: How long is it taking now?
I'd be surprised if you don't have some sort of benchmark already.
Even though you've provided some good info, so much of this is subjective and
relies
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:39 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Scenario:
· 550 Windows workstations, with 100+ of them remote.
· Active Directory (W2K8R2 and W2K3 DCs).
· Windows 7 and Windows XP.
· Users are local admins.
· Some remote
12 matches
Mail list logo
