Re: Microsoft Surface

t;> ** ** >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Dan Bartley >> >> >> >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:31 >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:

Re: Microsoft Surface

; > > > > ** ** > > *From:* John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:31 > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Microsoft Surface > > ** ** > > Cool=IPad? > John W. Cook > Network Operations Manager

Re: Microsoft Surface

ong Families > > > *From*: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] > *Sent*: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:27 AM > *To*: NT System Admin Issues > *Subject*: Re: Microsoft Surface > > I think that $600 is the max that a non-cool tablet can command at the > consumer level.

RE: Microsoft Surface

Cool != iPad Sent from my Windows Phone From: John Cook Sent: 19/06/2012 16:13 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Microsoft Surface Cool=IPad? John W. Cook Network Operations Manager Partnership for Strong Families From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz

RE: Microsoft Surface

, 2012 10:31 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Microsoft Surface Cool=IPad? John W. Cook Network Operations Manager Partnership for Strong Families From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re

RE: Microsoft Surface

ystem Admin Issues Subject: Re: Microsoft Surface I think that $600 is the max that a non-cool tablet can command at the consumer level. I suspect that Microsoft is looking to achieve sufficient cool factor to get past this, or to appeal directly to the corporate customer. They've b

Re: Microsoft Surface

Cool=IPad? John W. Cook Network Operations Manager Partnership for Strong Families From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Microsoft Surface I think that $600 is the max that a non-cool tablet can command at

Re: Microsoft Surface

;> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:35 PM, James Hill wrote: >>> >>>> Pro version will have CMD and Powershell J >>>> >>>> ** ** >>>> >>>> *From:* Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 19 June 2012 2:1

Re: Microsoft Surface

ng the tablet down to a reasonable, obtainable price. > > > -Original Message- > From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 2:22 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Microsoft Surface > > Good show, Microsoft

Re: Microsoft Surface

it needs is VB6 and perl... >> >> Heh. >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:35 PM, James Hill wrote: >> >>> Pro version will have CMD and Powershell J >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* Kurt Buff [ma

RE: Microsoft Surface

ck to my regular work PC. Disclaimer: I work for HP (but the above could work for any random Win7 tablet) Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com] Sent: Tuesday, 19 June 2012 11:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Microsoft Surface

RE: Microsoft Surface

012 11:02 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Microsoft Surface Is here: http://surface.com<http://surface.com/> I had a chance to see the technology itself demoed back in 2010, and it was most awesome. And now, in mobile format. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T

RE: Microsoft Surface

do whatever possible to bring the tablet down to a reasonable, obtainable price. -Original Message- From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 2:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Microsoft Surface Good show, Microsoft. It was an exce

Re: Microsoft Surface

Windows 8 Pro version of Surface. - Original Message - From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:01:34 -0700 Subject: Microsoft Surface > Is here: http://surface.com > > I ha

Re: Microsoft Surface

n 18, 2012 at 9:35 PM, James Hill wrote: > >> Pro version will have CMD and Powershell J >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, 19 June 2012 2:17 PM >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Sub

Re: Microsoft Surface

Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Microsoft Surface > > ** ** > > Well, it's got a keyboard - that's half the battle, in the absence of a > better interface (and voice definitely isn't it). > > Now, if it has a decent command line, I might take a look at it...***

Re: Microsoft Surface

Well, it's got a keyboard - that's half the battle, in the absence of a better interface (and voice definitely isn't it). Now, if it has a decent command line, I might take a look at it... On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > Is here: http://surface.com > > I had a chance

Re: Microsoft Surface

must be thrilled.* > *** > > ** ** > > *From:* Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com] > *Sent:* Monday, June 18, 2012 10:51 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Microsoft Surface > > ** ** > > It's Microsoft hardware. Microsoft is producing

RE: Microsoft Surface

uot;, to describe its touch-screen interface, is that about it? >Anything more than that going on here? > > > >Carl > > > >From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 9:02 PM >To: NT System Admin Issues >Subject: Microsoft Surfac

Re: Microsoft Surface

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > Is here: http://surface.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZrr7AZ9nCY -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~ --- To manage subscript

RE: Microsoft Surface

:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Microsoft Surface Is here: <http://surface.com/> http://surface.com I had a chance to see the technology itself demoed back in 2010, and it was most awesome. And now, in mobile format. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN&#