Try to leave unchanged the Max Num Tape Buffers
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Klint Price - ArizonaITPro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: venerdì 7 novembre 2008 21.38
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: Re: Comparing NT Backup speeds
Michael,
This is a test server in a test
blogs/michael
>
> Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
>
>
>
> *From:* Klint Price - ArizonaITPro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Friday, November 07, 2008 1:30 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Comparing NT Back
/michael
Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
From: Klint Price - ArizonaITPro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 1:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Comparing NT Backup speeds
These registry settings are causing backup speed
p://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
>
> Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
>
>
>
> *From:* Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:59 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Comparin
>It also allows you to schedule your jobs (which Task Scheduler built into
>windows allows you to do with ntbackup) and manage media sets (which RSM, also
>built into windows, allows you to do with ntbackup).
Well, I just dumped BE for RSM/NTBackup on a windows file server with an
autoloader an
There's a reason for that.
In a lot of ways NTbackup is - truly and honestly - "BE Lite."
On any 2000 or 2003 or XP (it's not installed by default but is on the
CD) machine if I start NTbackup and go into Help -> About Backup Utility
it even says VERITAS software in the copyrights.
I think you c
y, October 08, 2008 3:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Comparing NT Backup speeds
There's a reason for that.
In a lot of ways NTbackup is - truly and honestly - "BE Lite."
On any 2000 or 2003 or XP (it's not installed by default but is on the
CD) machine if I s
://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 3:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Comparing NT Backup speeds
The more I learn about NTbackup, the more I
The more I learn about NTbackup, the more I realize that BE is a just a GUI
wrapper for it...
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 9:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Comparing NT Backup speeds
I&#x
.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
>
>
>
> *From:* Klint Price - ArizonaITPro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 08, 2008 10:41 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Comparing NT Backup speeds
>
>
>
> any optimizations out there for
: Comparing NT Backup speeds
any optimizations out there for BackupExec?
Michael B. Smith wrote:
I dont think youll find any problems with it.
The section below is showing its age. It was written before Microsoft moved
to E12 and DPM and VSS. But it was accurate in the 2004
m/blogs/michael
>
> Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
>
>
>
> *From:* HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 08, 2008 2:08 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* R: Comparing NT Backup speeds
>
>
>
From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Comparing NT Backup speeds
You are very precious !
I have heard M called many things - but PRECIOUS!!! That is definitely a
new one for the books. J
Webster
_
Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: RE
You are very precious !
Thanks
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: mercoledì 8 ottobre 2008 13.09
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Comparing NT Backup speeds
I don't think you'll find any problems with it.
The sec
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 2:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: R: Comparing NT Backup speeds
I made the changes and even to disk the speed is doubled !I hope no issue or
contras because it looks too easy !
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
I made the changes and even to disk the speed is doubled !I hope no issue or
contras because it looks too easy !
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: martedì 7 ottobre 2008 22.55
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Comparing NT Backup speeds
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: HELP_PC
Inviato: martedì 7 ottobre 2008 15.11
A: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Oggetto: Contras on Nt Backup settings tweaks
Doubling the values in the registry for buffers in the Backup Engine settings I
almost double the speed of backups on disks .
exchange
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Comparing NT Backup speeds
Michael,
What are these tweaks you speak of?
jlc
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, Oct
Michael,
What are these tweaks you speak of?
jlc
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 6:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Comparing NT Backup speeds
Well a local device will usually be faster than a remote device.
Ntbackup, with the
System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Comparing NT Backup speeds
Well a local device will usually be faster than a remote device.
Ntbackup, with the registry tweaks, gives me about 1 GB per minute locally. But
I don't have a dat-72 to compare to. My home GB LAN with a cheap crappy switch
c
System Admin Issues
Subject: R: Comparing NT Backup speeds
Yes the DAT device is local.
Not applied registry tweaks
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: martedì 7 ottobre 2008 13.05
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Comparing NT
Yes the DAT device is local.
Not applied registry tweaks
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: martedì 7 ottobre 2008 13.05
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Comparing NT Backup speeds
Have you applied the "standard" registry
din.com/in/theessentialexchange
From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 1:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Comparing NT Backup speeds
In a network 10/100/1000 copper a NT backup of the complete server to a Qnap
device RAID-1 takes about 9 hours with ver
In a network 10/100/1000 copper a NT backup of the complete server to a
Qnap device RAID-1 takes about 9 hours with verify (about 50GB) versus
DAT-72 with separate card that takes half the time .
Should be considered normal ?
TIA
GuidoElia
HELPPC
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that
o an LBNC issue."
- B.O.F.H. (Merged 2 into 1) - Me
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 15:17 hrs
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: damaged NT backup
I have a .bkf file that has some folders/documents that corporate lawyers
are asking to see. Can anyon
I have a .bkf file that has some folders/documents that corporate lawyers
are asking to see. Can anyone recommend a decent product to help
cleanup/restore files from this 80 gig file? I am looking at Advanced BKF
Repair, by DataNumen for $150. Anyone use this or recommend something
better? Tha
0 sendTheMail
Instead of sendTheMail you must put the command to send an e-mail (for
example using blat)
It does not really check if the scheduled task has failed but rather if
the
backup itself has failed.
It's very basic but gets the job done, I think.
-Original Message-
From: J
d task has failed but rather if the
backup itself has failed.
It's very basic but gets the job done, I think.
-Original Message-
From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 2 april 2008 22:48
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: NT Backup Status
Anyway to get an email usi
Anyway to get an email using NT Backup in Server 2003 when a scheduled job
using the Scheduled Tasks fails? I want an email sent to me if the backup
has a problem.
James
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.
Never had any reason to go to Netbackup. The only reason I could think of is
cross-platform functionality.
-Original Message-
From: Giles Caldersmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 18:34
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NT Backup
Bugger Backupexec
Bugger Backupexec .. Upgrade to Netbackup. Much nicer and more reliable
(but you pay through the nose)
-Original Message-
From: Bill Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2001 11:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NT Backup
Doesn't insta
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NT Backup
Doesn't installing Exchange Admin on the backup server make NT backup
"Exchange Aware"
Sorry... have always invested in BackupExec...
Have even convinced 5 companies to thr
Doesn't installing Exchange Admin on the backup server make NT backup
"Exchange Aware"
Sorry... have always invested in BackupExec...
Have even convinced 5 companies to throw away ArghServSH*T for BackupExec...
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL P
Hey Rocky -
I seem to recall that NT Backup will not backup Exchange stores while they
are running. The last time I looked into this, I came up with the soln of
stopping/ restarting the services for the backup. Unfortunately, as you
aware, Exchange sometimes takes a bit of time and the backup
Quick.
I've never had to use NT backup on W2K for a client before. Well finally
have one cheap enough that doesn't want to spring for Veritas so my question
is.
When you use the backup wizard and it asks if you want to backup everything
on the machine, does that include the IS for E
can an NT Backup (i assume youre talking windows NT Backup not a third party
solution) create a file ? i don't think it does. it can only back up to
tape (i think). it does do compression if that's what you're asking.. w2K
backup backs up to files.
-Original Message
What is it being backed up to?
Sue Davenport wrote:
> I was asked this question,and, didn't know the answer. Anyone out there
> care to enlighten me? Thanks!
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_ch
Any file can be zipped.
But if you are already using compression on your BU's, It probably wont
help much.
-Original Message-
From: Sue Davenport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Can an NT backup file be zipped
any file can be zipped... whether or not it will compress is another
question...
-Original Message-
From: Sue Davenport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 08:27
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Can an NT backup file be zipped?
I was asked this question,and
I was asked this question,and, didn't know the answer. Anyone out there
care to enlighten me? Thanks!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
p:
KB Q239892
KB Q267574
jang
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, August 31, 2001 6:38 PM
Posted To: NTSysAdmin
Conversation: NT Backup Problem
Subject: NT Backup Problem
I am using NT Backup and I am getting the following error "T
I am using NT Backup and I am getting the following error "There is no
unused media available with the selected type." In TechNet Q269600 is the
only article listed and I tried it even though it is for a different drive.
I have tried several different tapes, same message.
How do y
42 matches
Mail list logo
