: Monday, July 26, 2010 10:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
Smart cards are optional for DirectAccess, not required. What I was trying
(poorly) to say was that Microsoft's internal implementation of DirectAccess is
set up to require smart card
]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 10:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
Smart cards are optional for DirectAccess, not required. What I was trying
(poorly) to say was that Microsoft's internal implementation of DirectAccess is
set up to require
: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:malcolm.re...@live.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 11:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
First - There's more to it than just translating IPv4 addresses to IPv6 and
back. Let me rephrase my statement and see
Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
Best. OoO. Reply. Ever.
-sc
From: Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 3:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
Indeed. :)
-ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote:
Best. OoO. Reply. Ever.
-sc
*From:* Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerschein.com]
*Sent:* Friday, July 23, 2010 3:53 PM
*To:* NT System Admin
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 17:43
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
O...
Actual field experience!
Did not know about the smart card requirement. That's good to know.
What smart card technology are you using, if you can say?
What
the Exchange list. Priceless…
*From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
*Sent:* Saturday, July 24, 2010 8:40 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
Best. OoO. Reply. Ever.
-sc
*From:* Brumbaugh, Luke
Oh man, that was awesome.
If you have saved away... either please re-post, or send me a copy!
-sc
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
I need
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
O...
Actual field experience!
Did not know about the smart card requirement. That's good to know.
What smart card technology are you using, if you can say?
What kind of apps have you run
Best. OoO. Reply. Ever.
-sc
From: Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 3:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
This is a new one, 22 OOO's and this.
From:
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
Best. OoO. Reply. Ever.
-sc
From: Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerschein.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 3:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anyone using Forefront UAG and Direct Access
+1
I forwarded that to folks on my current contract last week ...
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
From: Steven M. Caesare
IMHO, yes, and no.
It's basically IPSec to a gateway inside your network.
Nothing new there.
However, according to what I've read, it makes the connection at boot
time, which allows you to apply GPOs, login scripts, etc.
So, whoever gains access to the machine has access to your network.
I won't say DirectAccess is just another VPN, because it isn't, but it is a
VPN technology with pretty robust security. It isn't an easy setup, as it
requires working with IPv6 and certificates, however, once it is running, it
is really slick in operation. Just connecting your laptop to the
14 matches
Mail list logo
