Don't forget also that when a broadcast goes out to a dhcp server whichever
responds first is where that pc stays with, now, if too many hit the dhcp
server you will simply 'get denied' it won't rebroadcast to another dhcp
server. Just like dns, a negative response is still a response.
For this re
Thanks to all for your knowledgable and fast responses.
Curt
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu]
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:41 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: DHCP 80-20 rule
>
> I still don't get the
gt; To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: DHCP 80-20 rule
>
> I still don't get the 80-20 thing. 50-50 would distribute the load
> better and would potentially give you more leases if one fails.
> Perhaps
> the hope is that the one that fails is the one with 20% and that
hmmm, looks like I was incorrect according to this...
>From "Lease Renewals"
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc958919.aspx
If the client is unable to communicate with its original DHCP server, the
client waits until 87.5 percent of its lease time elapses. Then the client
enters a rebin
rver from which it got its original lease?
>
> Curt
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
>> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:17 AM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: RE: DHCP 80-20 rule
>>
>>
>>
Jim Dandy [mailto:jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DHCP 80-20 rule
I still don't get the 80-20 thing. 50-50 would distribute the load
better and would potentially give you more leases if one fails. Perhaps
the hope is tha
ase?
Curt
> -Original Message-
> From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:17 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: DHCP 80-20 rule
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jim Dandy
>
> > 1) Why 8
wyers.com
<http://www.officeforlawyers.com/onenote.htm>
Author - The Lawyer's Guide to Microsoft Outlook 2007:
http://tinyurl.com/5m3f5q
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DHCP 80-20 rule
My m
at 50 percent of that (12.5 of the original)……
>
>
>
> Soon someone will set us both straight J
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 01, 2009 2:17 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: D
[mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 2:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DHCP 80-20 rule
IIRC, it will not broadcast again until the lease actually expires. (someone
will jump in to correct me if I'm wrong)
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that IS
schorr
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DHCP 80-20 rule
At half lease time, the client should request an address renewal. The
renewal request would be sent to the DHCP server that provided the
orig
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Dandy
> 1) Why 80-20? Why not 50-50? If one server fails, wouldn't it be
> better for the other server to have a larger range from which to
> distribute addresses?
The 20 is designed to keep you alive and running while you fix the 80 server.
Certainl
At half lease time, the client should request an address *renewal*. The
renewal request would be sent to the DHCP server that provided the original
lease, it is not broadcast to DHCPServer2.
IIRC, it will not broadcast again until the lease actually expires.
(someone will jump in to correct me if
13 matches
Mail list logo
