Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

candidate already having touched the network I'd appreciate it. - Original Message - From: "Michael B. Smith" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:48:31 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? ABsol

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

What part are you referring to? Upgrade or VM? I have already ruled out upgrade. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:49 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? ABsolutely positively do NOT do this. As Brian said

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

bject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? I was planning on rolling out Exchange 2007 in the next 60 days. I have the hardware and need to complete the project. Given that the RC is upgradable to RTM, would any of you go ahead and deploy the RC in production? I don’t want to delay the project, plus I don’t

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

oundary is beneath that. From: Ben Scott [mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 10 or 7? On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Brian Desmond wrote: >> Good to know. Thanks. On Ex 2003

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Brian Desmond wrote: >> Good to know. Thanks. On Ex 2003 is it also 5000 limit per folder? > > AFAIK there is no hard limit, it’s just a strong recommendation for > performance reasons. PST/OST used to explode if it had more than 65535 items in a single folder.

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

Thanks, I didn’t know the release date. I will look into the CPU issue. From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? Bob- Exchange 2010 will be available to volume licensing customers on

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? I was planning on rolling out Exchange 2007 in the next 60 days. I have the hardware

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

purposes. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? You are incorrect. It is 100K items per folder. From: chipsh...@comcast.net [chipsh

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

: Exchange 10 or 7? Good to know. Thanks. On Ex 2003 is it also 5000 limit per folder? - Original Message - From: "Michael B. Smith" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:24:07 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? You a

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

Good to know. Thanks. On Ex 2003 is it also 5000 limit per folder? - Original Message - From: "Michael B. Smith" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:24:07 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? You are inc

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

Wow! If I go to 10, no one will ever delete anything… From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? You are incorrect. It is 100K items per folder

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

You are incorrect. It is 100K items per folder. From: chipsh...@comcast.net [chipsh...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 6:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 10 or 7? I believe that it is 100,000 items total per account not per

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

4:38:31 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? Yes, well, lots of executives don't seem to understand how to click an "X" or hit the delete key. But Outlook 2007 with service pack 2 will (should) perform as well as Outlook 2010 RTM . And replying to An

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

HA situations using Exchange 2010; HOWEVER - that would also require you to have a redundant LB in front of that server for it to be HA. From: Brian Desmond [br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 12:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

Maybe? Th�s an insane number of items in one folder. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 From: chipsh...@comcast.net [mailto:chipsh...@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 5:48 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 10 or 7? I believe you

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

t-software.com> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 9:57:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? Outlook 2007 (or 2003 or whatever) will work fine Thanks, Brian Desmond brian @ briandesmond .com c - 312.731.3132 -Original Message- From: Devin Meade [ mai

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

Outlook 2007 (or 2003 or whatever) will work fine Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 -Original Message- From: Devin Meade [mailto:devin.me...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 11:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 10 or 7? We plan

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

hold my breath. >> > >> > >> > >> > Carl >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] >> > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 10:12 AM >> > To: NT System Admin Issues >> > Sub

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

Exchange 2010… From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 9:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 10 or 7? What do you plan to use to do database replication? On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Devin Meade wrote: We plan on

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

ows the version of Windows, you might wish for SBS 2008 R2 > to > > include E2010. But I wouldn't hold my breath. > > > > > > > > Carl > > > > > > > > From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 10:12 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? > > > > I wonder if there is going to be a SBS 2010 to include e2k10 > > > > > > Phillip Partipilo > > Parametric

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

Since SBS follows the version of Windows, you might wish for SBS 2008 R2 to include E2010. But I wouldn't hold my breath. Carl From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 10:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? I wond

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

or 7? As my mailbox is the only one set up on our 2k7 setup, I’m definitely going to go to 2k10. Sean Rector, MCSE From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 5:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? Going to 2010 prolly

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

As my mailbox is the only one set up on our 2k7 setup, I'm definitely going to go to 2k10. Sean Rector, MCSE From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org] Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 5:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? Going to 2010 prolly here also, lo

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

...@butlerahs.com] Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? +1 From what I've heard CAS/HUBS can be on the same box as MB servers. Less hardware. :-) From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Friday, October 23, 20

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

+1 From what I've heard CAS/HUBS can be on the same box as MB servers. Less hardware. :) From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? You're going to be doing the work twice

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

You're going to be doing the work twice to go from 2007 to 2010. There's no in place upgrade or anything like that. If you're just running one box then it seems logical to me that going straight to 2010 would be A LOT easier and cheaper in the long run. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

. You will have less issues. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? I've already done about 10 of these migrations. The process isn't any different. There are s

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

sday, October 22, 2009 11:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? IMHO I’d say go to 2007. As you are a non-profit, you probably take heavy advantage of Google Tech Support, which if you have done any searches lately there’s a lot more out there on 2007 than there i

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 1:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 10 or 7? I could see the omittance of continuous replication being a turn off for those already using it with Exchange 2007, but would it necessarily be a big deal for those moving from 03

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

I could see the omittance of continuous replication being a turn off for those already using it with Exchange 2007, but would it necessarily be a big deal for those moving from 03 straight to 2010? - Sean On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Sherry Abercrombie wrote: > I would take a look at the E

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, October 22, 2009 10:33 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Exchange 10 or 7? > > > > google tech support? > > - Original Message - > > *From:* Maglinger, Paul > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > > *Se

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

Yep. Otherwise known as GoogleFu, LMGTFY, etc. Very often and highly recommended by members of this list... From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 10:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 10 or 7? google tech support

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:32 AM, James Kerr wrote: > google tech support? 1. Go to Google 2. Type in your question 3. Hit "Search" ;-) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

I just realized what you meant. Yeah I use GTS all the time as well. - Original Message - From: James Kerr To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:32 AM Subject: Re: Exchange 10 or 7? google tech support? - Original Message - From

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

google tech support? - Original Message - From: Maglinger, Paul To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:26 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? IMHO I'd say go to 2007. As you are a non-profit, you probably take heavy advantage of Google Tech Su

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

10 yet. Paul From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 10:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 10 or 7? I would agree that the issue is more appropriately dealt with on the Exchange List than here. But my quick feelings on it a

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

m: Bryan Garmon [mailto:bryan.gar...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 9:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 10 or 7? There is no upgrade for either 2007 or 2010 so using new hardware isn't really a choice - it's the only option. They call it a "migration

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

I think that you could always use Double Take or XOsoft or something to address some of the replication issues. I am going from 03 to 10 once I have the time and energy to tackle it. Why don't you do it first Don, and then write up some good instructions? ;-) On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:01 AM, She

RE: Exchange 10 or 7?

and moving mailboxes, not too tough really. YMMV, Tim From: Bryan Garmon [mailto:bryan.gar...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 9:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 10 or 7? There is no upgrade for either 2007 or 2010 so using new hardware isn't really a choice -

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

I would take a look at the Exchange list as suggested, and look specifically for a discussion on Exchange 2007 as the subject, last post to it was yesterday. Michael B. Smith makes some really interesting, and for me compelling reasons, about the cons of Exchange 2010, including the fact that cont

Re: Exchange 10 or 7?

There is no upgrade for either 2007 or 2010 so using new hardware isn't really a choice - it's the only option. They call it a "migration" - when what it really should be called is a pain in the backside. I would hit up the Sunbelt Exchange list with this question as the people on that list but if