of this testing is appropriate to
> bill the client for and how much should just fall under my time for
> education – that should be easy enough…
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:0
t
should be easy enough...
Thanks!
Dave
From: Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: Licensing Q.
+1
The BSA generally only comes knocking on your door if they have reason to
believe that someone is blatantly tryin
+1
The BSA generally only comes knocking on your door if they have reason to
believe that someone is blatantly trying to avoid paying for licensing. It
is obvious from your email that you are concerned about remaining compliant.
That in and of itself would likely go a long way if in fact you are e
First, I do not believe that it is humanly possible to be compliant with
Microsoft Licensing. Even with 50 full time employees who only check licensing
requirements in an environment of only 49 computers there would still be some
kind of weird violation.
You are building a box to test and will
Like most other MS OS licensing, isn't there a 120 day eval for SBS? If so,
as long as you will only have that environment up for 120 days or less, and
the fact that it is a temporary test environment, I'd be inclined to say it
falls under the intent of 120 day eval... but I am not a lawyer and YMM
They want you to buy an MSDN license for that.
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Licensing Q.
I have a client that just last night I stood up their 2nd Hyper-V server. They
are an SBS 2003 shop and now I (thi
