RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Shauna Hensala
, 25 Jan 2013 11:02:45 -0500 Subject: RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails No, I meant just tell them no constraints on replying/sending to all is bad. : ) Regards, Don Guyer Catholic Health East - Information TechnologyEnterprise Directory & Messaging Services 3805 West Chester Pike, S

RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Guyer, Don
immediate assistance, please open a Service Desk ticket or call the helpdesk @ 610-492-3839. [cid:image001.jpg@01CDFB08.C58DD810] From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails F

Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Steven Peck
> helpdesk @ 610-492-3839.* > > [image: Description: Description: Description: InfoService-Logo240] > > ** ** > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January 25, 2013 10:45 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Limiti

RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Guyer, Don
AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails And management doesn't make bad decisions? On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Guyer, Don mailto:dgu...@che.org>> wrote: *Ross Perot (Dana Carvey) voice* It's bad, just bad... Regards, Don

RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Aakash Shah
n as it was mentioned earlier, it's a losing battle. -Aakash From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 6:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails It's kind of an all or nothing proposition http://blogs.technet.

Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Jonathan Link
assistance, please open a Service Desk ticket or call the > helpdesk @ 610-492-3839.* > > [image: Description: Description: Description: InfoService-Logo240] > > ** ** > > *From:* Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January 25

Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Bill Humphries
yeah, I know companies that have had an employee forward huge attachments to everyone and brought the mail server to it’s knees. Bill From: Andrew S. Baker Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:42 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails There's no

RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Guyer, Don
ues Subject: RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails No links, but management here clamped down because people were sending personal charity, business, and "greeting cards" emails to everybody. That, and I brought up how easy it would be for a disgruntled employee to send an ina

RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Kennedy, Jim
ning sessions on how excessive e-mails result in lost productivity... From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 6:10 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails No links, but management here clamped down because people w

RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread John Cook
mpTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails There's no link to cure that problem. I wouldn't worry about solving it if they aren't i

RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread David Lum
lt in lost productivity... From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 6:10 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails No links, but management here clamped down because people were sending personal charity, business, and

Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Andrew S. Baker
ailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] >> *Sent:* Friday, January 25, 2013 3:43 AM >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails >> >> ** ** >> >> Just wait till someone forwards a joke or scam report to

RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Maglinger, Paul
No links, but management here clamped down because people were sending personal charity, business, and "greeting cards" emails to everybody. That, and I brought up how easy it would be for a disgruntled employee to send an inappropriate message to the entire company. -Paul From: David Lum [ma

Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread Jonathan Link
o:kz2...@googlemail.com 'cvml', 'kz2...@googlemail.com');>] > > *Sent:* Friday, January 25, 2013 3:43 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails > > ** ** > > Just wait till someone forwards a joke or scam r

Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread James Rankin
com [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January 25, 2013 3:43 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails > > ** ** > > Just wait till someone forwards a joke or scam report to your entire > sta

RE: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread David Lum
Nope, that already happens, and we have employees that REPLY ALL to those.. From: kz2...@googlemail.com [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails Just wait till someone forwards a joke or

Re: Limiting who can send all-staff e-mails

2013-01-25 Thread kz20fl
Just wait till someone forwards a joke or scam report to your entire staff, or asks for someone to move their car. That should do it. Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY -Original Message- From: David Lum Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:14:36 To: NT S