RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-08 Thread Steven M. Caesare
, 2009 5:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS That would be most excellent of them to make available. Do you need Secret Squirrel level clearance? -- ME2 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Michael B. Smith mich

RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-07 Thread David Lum
:). David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS Just to be sure

RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-07 Thread Brian Desmond
The dumps are highly compressible generally... Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 3:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Memory Dumps on large

RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-07 Thread Michael B. Smith
tru dat. From: Brian Desmond [br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS The dumps are highly compressible generally... Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com

RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Michael B. Smith
Yes, and they take a damn long time to transfer too. Best practice for pagefile size on 64-bit Exchange Servers is RAM + 15 MB. And page file space is only loosely correlated to paging out. I've got a great presentation on this topic that was made in a closed forum by Mark Russinovich (of

Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
That would be most excellent of them to make available. Do you need Secret Squirrel level clearance? -- ME2 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.comwrote: Yes, and they take a damn long time to transfer too. Best practice for pagefile size on 64-bit

RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Michael B. Smith
... From: Micheal Espinola Jr [michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 5:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS That would be most excellent of them to make available. Do you need Secret Squirrel level clearance? -- ME2 On Wed, May 6, 2009

Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
] *Sent:* Wednesday, May 06, 2009 5:58 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS That would be most excellent of them to make available. Do you need Secret Squirrel level clearance? -- ME2 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Michael B. Smith mich

RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Ken Schaefer
: Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS I love how Microsoft has been dancing around why 7 doesn't have a new major release number (i.e 7.0), and is still within the 6.x cycle. -- ME2 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.commailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote

Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
:* Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS I love how Microsoft has been dancing around why 7 doesn't have a new major release number (i.e 7.0), and is still within the 6.x cycle. -- ME2 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote: what you commonly see

RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Michael B. Smith
[michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 9:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS I've heard this, but is that a *truly* legit reason to disregard proper development/release numbering? What exactly is it going to break that cannot be properly

Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
as v7.0 given that it is currently named an R2 release? Cheers Ken -- *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [michealespin...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, 7 May 2009 11:01 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS I've heard

Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com wrote: Because I mean, Windows 7 is a brand new operating system that we are paying for!  Its certainly not just a fixed version of Vista. I mean, come on... My irony meter just exploded. ;-) -- Ben ~ Finally,

RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Carl Houseman
...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 9:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS I thought there were tool and work-arounds for such issues? And, wouldn't it be on those applications to be upgraded/patched for a new operating system? Because I mean

RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Ken Schaefer
...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 9:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS I thought there were tool and work-arounds for such issues? And, wouldn't it be on those applications to be upgraded/patched for a new operating system? Because I mean, Windows

Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Just to be sure: Everyone's facetious-sarcasm meters should have pegged in the red on that one. -- ME2 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com wrote: Because I mean, Windows 7 is a

RE: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS

2009-05-06 Thread Ken Schaefer
I was going to reply, then decided that both you and Microsoft appear to be in agreement :-) Cheers Ken From: Micheal Espinola Jr [michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2009 12:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Memory Dumps on large RAM OS