not always the case... though
-Original Message-
From: Ivan von Winlamerberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
the best test:
e-mail to a person working for a net security co and see for
diation from nuclear blasts; Other
restrictions may apply.
If something offends you, lighten up, get a life, and move on
hehe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT E-Mail
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
08/31/2001 10:46 Subject: RE: OT E-Mail Discl
Someone wanted a disclaimer.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - The information contained in this email message is
intended only for the confidential use of the named recipient. The
information herein is also protected under the Berne Convention For Email
Messages. If you have received this message in
--- Sean Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the flip side, email any major law firm. Chances are you will
> see one.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sean Martin, MCSE
> Network Administrator
> Ribelin Lowell & Company
> Insurance Brokers, Inc.
> 3111 C Street, Suite 300
> Anchorage, Alaska 99503
> Ph: (9
e, Alaska 99503
Ph: (907) 561-1250
Fax: (907) 561-4315
Cell: (907) 229-0885
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT E-
Unless it's at the bottom of the email in which case you'll likely delete it
without even knowing it's there. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT E-Mail Discl
MAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Ivan von Winlamerberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
the best test:
e-mail to a person working for a net secur
the best test:
e-mail to a person working for a net security co and see for
yourself there will be no disclaimer in the reply
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
http://
I just got this email, re-initializing as we speak ;)
I will be turning myself in shortly.
-Original Message-
From: Ivan von Winlamerberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
--- "C
--- "Correa, Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do they serve some legal purpose?
they are totally useless; see below
=
<--65--->
This email is intended to be received by the intended recipient only. If the sender
misdirected this em
Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:47
AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
And for however long you have attached it to messages, how
many times has anyone called?
K.Borndale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -home
email
- Origin
29, 2001 11:47
AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
And for however long you have attached it to messages, how
many times has anyone called?
K.Borndale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -home
email
ED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29,
2001 9:39 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT
E-Mail Disclaimers
I
agree with the majority on this one. Disclaimers are pretty
obnoxious. Yet I was asked to implement one. However, I don't think
the reason for most organizations using disclaim
Issues
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:15
PM
Subject: RE: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
We
have everyone put the following disclaimer on anything that is not
personal. It is what our legal department came up
with.
CONFIDENTIALITY
NOTICE
The information contained in
315Cell: (907)
229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:16
AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
We
have everyone put the following disclaimer on anything that is
Lawyers seem to like them. The theory is that if a message says something
that the company would wish to disassociate itself from, the disclaimer[1]
gives some basis for this. I remain unconvinced that it would actually stand
up in court[4]. After all, we don't attach disclaimers when we talk on t
System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
Thanks to all who
replied. We are reviewing this topic since users are allowed to send and
receive personal mail as well as Official mail due to our remote
location. While it may have no legal standpoint at this time, it does
bject: RE: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
I did
see a disclaimer on a quart of slaw.
-Original Message-From: Kelly Borndale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:26
AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
I don't think that has ever really been
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001
11:08 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
They are just plain evil, I would highly recommend going over to the
Exchange list and asking the question. Just put on your flame suit
first.
Jeff
-Original Message
Title: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
I did
see a disclaimer on a quart of slaw.
-Original Message-From: Kelly Borndale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:26
AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Re: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
I don't think that has ever really
Title: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
I have
no impression of them. I never read them.
William
-Original Message-From: Banyas, Pat F. Civ
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001
7:34 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
I have been considering add
System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
We
should discuss this on the Swynk Exchange list (ls.swynk.com) They love
discussing email disclaimers and do it quite often.
-Original Message-From: Correa, Andre
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday
EMAIL PROTECTED] -home
email
- Original Message -
From:
Correa, Andre
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:03
AM
Subject: RE: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
Do
they serve some legal purpose?
-Original
Me
IssuesSubject: RE: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
Do
they serve some legal purpose?
-Original
Message-From: Kelly
Borndale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:45
AMTo: NT System Admin
IssuesSubject: Re: OT E-Mail
Disclaimers
They are
Title: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
Do they
serve some legal purpose?
-Original
Message-
From: Kelly Borndale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001
10:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
They are
annoying, and they mean
Title: OT E-Mail Disclaimers
They are annoying, and they mean little to
nothing.
K.Borndale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -home
email
- Original Message -
From:
Banyas, Pat F. Civ
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, A
27 matches
Mail list logo
