Re: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-09 Thread Graeme Carstairs
y, May 09, 2008 9:10 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Removing SBS2003. > > > > Ken, > > I understand what you are saying, > > I don't believe it is and AD issue but we were informed from MS presales > partner support that any Windows 2003

RE: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-09 Thread NTSysAdmin
Active Directory that thinks it's SBS), so whoever your contacts are will need to elaborate on what it is they are claiming. Cheers Ken From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Friday, 9 May 2008 9:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: R

RE: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-09 Thread Ken Schaefer
e former presence of SBS Cheers Ken From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 9 May 2008 10:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Removing SBS2003. Ken, I understand what you are saying, I don't believe it is and AD issue but we were informed from MS presales

Re: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-09 Thread Graeme Carstairs
that thinks it's SBS), so whoever your contacts are > will need to elaborate on what it is they are claiming. > > > > Cheers > > Ken > > > > *From:* Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Friday, 9 May 2008 9:46 PM > > *To:* NT System Ad

Re: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-09 Thread Joe Fox
> will need to elaborate on what it is they are claiming. > > > > Cheers > > Ken > > > > *From:* Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Friday, 9 May 2008 9:46 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Removing SBS2003. > > > > K

RE: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-09 Thread Ken Schaefer
te on what it is they are claiming. Cheers Ken From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 9 May 2008 9:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Removing SBS2003. Ken, thats interesting as we were told by Microsoft that we would need to transition the SBS server first, as

Re: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-09 Thread Graeme Carstairs
rs, DCs, WSS boxes, because the existing hardware is due to be > retired), then this isn't really necessary. > > > > Cheers > > Ken > > > > *From:* Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Friday, 9 May 2008 5:53 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin

RE: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-09 Thread Ken Schaefer
From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 9 May 2008 5:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Removing SBS2003. Microsoft do an SBS 2003 to windows Transition pack. You run it on your SBS 2003 server and it converts it to a full blown Windows 2003 DC running full Exc

Re: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-09 Thread Graeme Carstairs
that server in AD (no need for metadata > cleanup). > > Cheers > Ken > > > -Original Message- > > From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, 9 May 2008 5:41 AM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: Removing SBS200

RE: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-08 Thread Ken Schaefer
). Cheers Ken > -Original Message- > From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 9 May 2008 5:41 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Removing SBS2003. > > It goes something like that... except that the SBS2003 server won't let > any othe

RE: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-08 Thread Amer Karim
ds, Amer Karim -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 8, 2008 12:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Removing SBS2003. It goes something like that... except that the SBS2003 server won't let any other machine hold the FSMO roles. You need

Re: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-08 Thread Joe Fox
hursday, May 8, 2008 3:41:10 PM > Subject: Re: Removing SBS2003. > > It goes something like that... except that the SBS2003 server won't let > any other machine hold the FSMO roles. You need to "violently" rip > SBS2003 out and tell the 2003 DC to seize the roles. >

Re: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-08 Thread mck1012
you could also use the ADMT to migrate, I would not recommend just pulling the SBS server - Original Message From: Phil Brutsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2008 3:41:10 PM Subject: Re: Removing SBS2003. It goes something like that...

Re: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-08 Thread mck1012
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2008 3:41:10 PM Subject: Re: Removing SBS2003. It goes something like that... except that the SBS2003 server won't let any other machine hold the FSMO roles. You need to "violently" rip SBS2003 out and tell the 2003 DC to seize the roles. The procedure would go so

Re: Removing SBS2003.

2008-05-08 Thread Phil Brutsche
It goes something like that... except that the SBS2003 server won't let any other machine hold the FSMO roles. You need to "violently" rip SBS2003 out and tell the 2003 DC to seize the roles. The procedure would go something like this: 1) Bring up 2003 machine 2) Add 2003 machine to SBS2003 domai