System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SSD for lab Hyper-V server
MLC is the TLA you're looking for. Multi Level Cell SSDs provide higher
density at a lower cost. SLC provide fast performance and endurance, but at
a higher cost. I like the comparison covered in the following paper.
http
with 8x2TB drives, and 4 80GB SSD for logging
and write caching, it made a huge difference when we realized we had MFC and
changed them to SLC drives.
From: Mark Boeck [mailto:netadmin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SSD for lab Hyper-V
:* Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:46 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: SSD for lab Hyper-V server
** **
Enjoy the HD speed. Depending on the age of the PE, you'll be running
slower than expected from a CPU / memory point of view.
Perhaps take the SSD and put
and write caching, it made a huge difference when we realized we had
MFC and changed them to SLC drives.
From: Mark Boeck [mailto:netadmin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SSD for lab Hyper-V server
Enjoy the HD speed
I just bought a little server for Hyper-V and bought it with an 80GB SSD. I
verified with MBS that the 80GB would be fine. I originally specced it out
with a 40GB. My minimum partition size for 2008 R2 is 40GB so the 80GB gives
more breathing room and it not much more in price than a 40GB.
Ah size. Checking NewEgg yeah, $30 extra doubles the capacity...
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 6:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSD for lab Hyper-V server
I just bought a little server for Hyper-V and bought it with an 80GB SSD
Enjoy the HD speed. Depending on the age of the PE, you'll be running
slower than expected from a CPU / memory point of view.
Perhaps take the SSD and put it in a newer home PC and enjoy the boot and
operational speed there...
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:28 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
