Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

“view > hidden tasks”. > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael B. Smith > > Consultant and Exchange MVP > > http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > > > *From:* Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2011 12:31 PM > > *To:* NT Sys

Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

gt; Michael B. Smith > > Consultant and Exchange MVP > > http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > > > *From:* Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2011 12:31 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box > > >

Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

I'd recommend leaving them. :) The OS handles them just fine without any performance issue that I'm aware of. Plus what Brian said... *ASB *(Professional Bio ) *Technology Services that Maximize Business Results... * On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:25 AM, J

RE: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box While I really like 2008/2008R2 I'm a bit at a loss trying to understand why there would be Tasks which would be considered core to the OS

Re: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

While I really like 2008/2008R2 I'm a bit at a loss trying to understand why there would be Tasks which would be considered core to the OS even visible. I'm not a software developer, but why make important scheduled tasks ,strictly designed for the OS, clearly visible to the server admin.. O

RE: Scheduled tasks on a 2008 R2 box

If there isn't a problem they're causing I wouldn't go messing with it. Much of this stuff is core to the OS and they aren't likely to have done any testing with it turned off... Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132 From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2..