RE: adobe acrobat standard vs. Pro

2012-01-06 Thread Michael B. Smith
Admin Issues Subject: Re: adobe acrobat standard vs. Pro On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > Basically encapsulated EPS, as I understand it. Indeed. PDF began life as a project to produce a Postscript-like page description language without the potentially danger

Re: adobe acrobat standard vs. Pro

2012-01-06 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > Basically encapsulated EPS, as I understand it. Indeed. PDF began life as a project to produce a Postscript-like page description language without the potentially dangerous capabilities of Postscript, which is more like a complete prog

RE: adobe acrobat standard vs. Pro

2012-01-06 Thread Michael B. Smith
Basically encapsulated EPS, as I understand it. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 9:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: adobe acrobat standard vs. Pro I

RE: adobe acrobat standard vs. Pro

2012-01-06 Thread Webster
I agree. The typical PDF file I generate from the Word copy of my book is about 2MB in size. The PDF file that lulu.com requires creates a 30MB file. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com From: Richard Stovall [mailto