RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Paul Armstrong
Message- From: Greg Tupper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 3:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K you may be able to run the setup again but this time leave the default instance name check on instead of specifying a name. If that does not

RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Greg Tupper
m: Greg Tupper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K Paul, With sql2k you can run multiple instances on the same box. This means that you can have more then one sql server running on the same box. All you real

RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Paul Armstrong
er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K Paul, With sql2k you can run multiple instances on the same box. This means that you can have more then one sql server running on the same box. All you really need i

RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Lanza Joseph Contr AFRL/IFEB
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K It's good for use in development areas where buying multiple servers makes no sense with a limited user count, and also because you can create SQL servers using diffe

RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Bunting, Jeff
Issues Subject: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K Hello All, I am doing some research on working with SMS 2.0. I know I can work with it on Windows 2000 using the latest SMS service packs but what about using SQL 2000 instead of SQL 7? I am searching M$'s site right now and have yet to find an answer? Ca

RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Greg Tupper
because in my current environment it would not work very well. greg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K Would there be any advantage to running mult

RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Ian Kelly
ECTED] "If you are not free to choose wrongly and irresponsibly, you are not free at all." -- Jacob Hornberger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 August 2001 14:14 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Dan_Rembolt
cc: 08/31/2001 Subject: RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K 11:09 AM Please

RE: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Greg Tupper
Issues Subject: FW: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K Okay, i found something saying that SQL 2K works with SMS 2.0. Now I have another question about the below statement: SQL Server 2000 is fully supported in Systems Management Server 2.0 Service Pack 2 (SP2) with the following limitations: * Only

FW: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Paul Armstrong
August 31, 2001 1:27 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues (E-mail) > Subject: SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K > > Hello All, > > I am doing some research on working with SMS 2.0. I know I can work > with it on Windows 2000 using the latest SMS service packs but what > about using SQL

SMS 2.0 & SQL 2K

2001-08-31 Thread Paul Armstrong
Hello All, I am doing some research on working with SMS 2.0. I know I can work with it on Windows 2000 using the latest SMS service packs but what about using SQL 2000 instead of SQL 7? I am searching M$'s site right now and have yet to find an answer? Can someone confirm if this would work and w