/mailmarshal-smtp.asp
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2010 12:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Spam appliances/services
Folks,
I'm in the market to replace my current spam filter. Google Message Security
looks pretty good as a service, although it's
- 312.731.3132
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Spam appliances/services
Indeed...
ASB
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Ben Scott
mailvor...@gmail.commailto:mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep
*Subject:* Re: Spam appliances/services
We had Barracuda, and loved it. When it came time to replace due to age,
we looked around again. This time we went with Ironport. We like it even
better. The big difference (to us) is the reputation filter simply drops a
large part of spam
-software.com
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:52:13 AM
Subject: RE: Spam appliances/services
Barracuda.
No per-user fees, very configurable and awesome tech support. I had them at
%previousjob% and am trying like heck to get them in at %currentjob%.
They’ll even send you a 90 eval
Indeed...
*ASB *
* *
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Roger Wright rhw...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, email filtering is the ideal application for cloud computing. Most
of
the nasties originate out there anyway, so keep
http://www.gfi.com/hosted-email-security
Excellent continuity feature in this product - truly remarkable. Antispam and
Antivirus are also quite good.
Alex
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Spam appliances
We need to fix that page... we're actually not shipping that product. We are
coming out with an appliance in December.
From: Jeff Steward [mailto:jstew...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Spam appliances/services
In fairness
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Alex Eckelberry
al...@sunbelt-software.com wrote:
We need to fix that page… we’re actually not shipping that product.
That's never stopped anyone from advertising something. ;-)
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Folks,
I'm in the market to replace my current spam filter. Google Message Security
looks pretty good as a service, although it's pricing for us. I've heard good
things about Barracuda SPAM and Virus filter, as well as M+ from Messaging
Architects. Sorry Sunbelt, we don't run Exchange so
Issues
Subject: Spam appliances/services
Folks,
I'm in the market to replace my current spam filter. Google Message
Security looks pretty good as a service, although it's pricing for us.
I've heard good things about Barracuda SPAM and Virus filter, as well as
M+ from Messaging Architects. Sorry
We had Barracuda, and loved it. When it came time to replace due to age, we
looked around again. This time we went with Ironport. We like it even
better. The big difference (to us) is the reputation filter simply drops a
large part of spam and malware laden email at the network connection
I've used Google's Postini mail filtering service very successfully in two
environments. I found it cumbersome to setup initially but very effective
and hands-off once configured. Users receive daily quarantine summaries and
can easily tweak their individual approved/blocked lists. I selected
, September 23, 2010 9:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Spam appliances/services
Folks,
I'm in the market to replace my current spam filter. Google Message Security
looks pretty good as a service, although it's pricing for us. I've heard good
things about Barracuda SPAM and Virus filter
: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Spam appliances/services
We had Barracuda, and loved it. When it came time to replace due to
age, we looked around again. This time we went with Ironport. We like
it even better. The big difference (to us
In fairness to the list sponsor, the do have an appliance that doesn't
require you to run Exchange:
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/Ninja-Blade/
-Jeff Steward
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
Folks,
I'm in the market to replace my current spam
, so
they are routing the email from the RedCondor and just passing it through
the Barracuda to the mail server.
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Spam appliances/services
Folks,
I'm in the market
Barracuda works well. We don't use the per-user quarantine, but it is
available. They now offer a VMware VM in addition to hardware solutions
(see http://www.barracudanetworks.com/ns/products/vm_overview.php).
One thing I've always like about Barracuda is that you can demo the products
for a
, so we may be looking to abandon the hosted anti-spam service.
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Spam appliances/services
Folks
:* Spam appliances/services
Folks,
I'm in the market to replace my current spam filter. Google Message
Security looks pretty good as a service, although it's pricing for us. I've
heard good things about Barracuda SPAM and Virus filter, as well as M+ from
Messaging Architects. Sorry
Subject: RE: Spam appliances/services
Barracuda.
No per-user fees, very configurable and awesome tech support. I had them at
%previousjob% and am trying like heck to get them in at %currentjob%.
They'll even send you a 90 eval unit for free if you want to try it out.
Jim Holmgren
Manager
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
I'm in the market to replace my current spam filter.
I can say this: Avoid MX Logic (now owned by McAfee (now owned by Intel)).
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
, September 23, 2010 11:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Spam appliances/services
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
I'm in the market to replace my current spam filter.
I can say this: Avoid MX Logic (now owned by McAfee (now owned by
Intel)).
-- Ben
, September 23, 2010 9:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Spam appliances/services
Folks,
I'm in the market to replace my current spam filter. Google Message Security
looks pretty good as a service, although it's pricing for us. I've heard good
things about Barracuda SPAM and Virus filter
AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam appliances/services
We had Barracuda and moved to Brightmail a while back. I know, it has the
shame of Symantec about it but it's an awesome product anyway.
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.217.6851 (fax)
HARRISON
+1 on Brightmail.
Every time I needed support, their support staff is awesome. I know,
hard to imagine :)
Sam
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam appliances/services
I
.
*From:* Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 9:52 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Spam appliances/services
Barracuda.
No per-user fees, very configurable and awesome tech support. I had
them
I had the spam and ham trained it was set and forget.
--
*From:* Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.comjholmg...@xlhealth.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 9:52 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Spam appliances/services
Barracuda
...@hedgedigger.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Spam appliances/services
Good things about the barracuda that standout are no per user licensing and
easy to setup for multiple domains with or without ldap lookups. Since looking
at other options, I
IMHO, email filtering is the ideal application for cloud computing. Most of
the nasties originate out there anyway, so keep all that junk off your
circuit entirely.
Roger Wright
___
When it's GOOD there ain't nothin' like it, and when it's BAD there ain't
nothin' like it!
On Thu, Sep 23,
:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 9:52 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Spam appliances/services
Barracuda.
No per-user fees, very configurable and awesome tech support. I had them
at %previousjob% and am trying like heck to get them in at %currentjob%.
They’ll even send you a 90
[mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 9:52 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Spam appliances/services
Barracuda.
No per-user fees, very configurable and awesome tech support. I
had them at %previousjob% and am trying like heck
it was set and forget.
*From:* Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 9:52 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: Spam appliances/services
Barracuda.
No per-user
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Roger Wright rhw...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, email filtering is the ideal application for cloud computing. Most of
the nasties originate out there anyway, so keep all that junk off your
circuit entirely.
+1
First-pass email filtering is one of the few
System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Spam appliances/services
Got pricing: $1,000 one time fee for VM. You actually have per user licensing
with the VM. $160 per 100 users for a year.
N Parr wrote:
I ran in to the replacement issue on my web filter, turned out it was
much cheaper to just
+1 for IronPort.
From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 7:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Spam appliances/services
We had Barracuda, and loved it. When it came time to replace due to age, we
looked around again. This time we went
35 matches
Mail list logo
