>
>
>
>
> From: René de Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 January 2008 13:01
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: VMWare Server Disk Config Questions
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: VMWare Server Disk Config Questions
>
>
>
, but Im sure your high end emc
box runs faster than my datacore box with scsi drives with raid0 vs raid10.
J
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 10:23 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VMWare Server Disk Config Questions
Honestly
"Clayton Doige" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/09/2008 09:35:01
AM:
> would I be right in saying that if I
> partition the system so that there is say 30GB for the base OS,
> and then put everything else on one container I will be better
> off than my original spec below?
No - containers are
: RE: VMWare Server Disk Config Questions
I believe there is disk recommendation setups in the Vmware best practices
documentation on www.vmware.com <http://www.vmware.com/>
Z
_
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 9:47
Issues
Subject: RE: VMWare Server Disk Config Questions
I would sway away from raid on a vmdisk personally and use storage failover at
the bit level (iscsi appliance type). There is no point in partitioning out a
physical drive that I have ever known and is magnified with a vm since your r/
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 9:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VMWare Server Disk Config Questions
Thanks all for the responses. Bearing in mind that this configuration is
being designed as a disaster recovery system, where for that main, the only
IO will be incoming
base OS, and then
put everything else on one container I will be better off than my original spec
below?
Thanks
Clayton
From: René de Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 January 2008 13:01
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VMWare Server Disk Config Questions
Since
g you know.
From: Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 6:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: VMWare Server Disk Config Questions
Dear all, sorry if this is either off topic, or marginally stupid. I am
about to spec out a box that will host 3 vi
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VMWare Server Disk Config Questions
My opinion is that if that array degrades, each vm is effected and the rebuild
will take forever if its busy. Also, if one vm sees heavy disc IO, the whole
system suffers. Not a lot of isolation there...
jlc
From: Clayton
AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: VMWare Server Disk Config Questions
Dear all, sorry if this is either off topic, or marginally stupid. I am about
to spec out a box that will host 3 virtual machines for DR purposes. I wanted
to run my thoughts past the list to see where the error in my
Not that I can see but then I do things a little different. This will also
depend on which version of VMWare you are using. I do not have the money to
invest in doing it as right as I should so I have to use the "free"
version. I have a dedicated RAID 1 for the OS something like 36 GB or so.
I a
Dear all, sorry if this is either off topic, or marginally stupid. I am
about to spec out a box that will host 3 virtual machines for DR
purposes. I wanted to run my thoughts past the list to see where the
error in my thought process is, as I am sure there is one (or more) lol.
The physical mac
12 matches
Mail list logo
