Testing

Been quite quiet for a few days. Maybe everyone said frak it and went home... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_foru

RE: Favorite tools for automating XSS testing

...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 8:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Favorite tools for automating XSS testing Thanks, Z Yeah, I've noticed that automation only gets you but so far with XSS and CSRF discovery... Oh well, something to do. :) Thanks again for the li

RE: Favorite tools for automating XSS testing

These aren't exactly Automated, as with any XSS testing it's a bit more manual than automated IMHO. Especially if you want to truly show the evilness of what XSS vulnerabilities can do. Backtrack Penetration Platform ( W3AF), other tools Burp-Suite Pro (One of my favorites)

RE: UAG configuration for DA - I'm testing it now...

rough VPN. Joe Heaton ITB – Windows Server Support -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 9:19 PM To: Heaton, Joseph@DFG; NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: UAG configuration for DA - I'm testing it now... Yeah, I went back an

Re: UAG configuration for DA - I'm testing it now...

es > to access IPv4 resources. > > -Original Message- > From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 8:54 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: UAG configuration for DA - I'm testing it now... > > I set up a UAG for a

RE: UAG configuration for DA - I'm testing it now...

Oh, I missed that part. Yes, DA requires IPv6 and IPv6 tunneling technologies to access IPv4 resources. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 8:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: UAG configuration for DA - I'm testi

Re: UAG configuration for DA - I'm testing it now...

- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 08:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: UAG configuration for DA - I'm testing it now... You can disable the IPv6 stack. If you want. I guess the question is, what are you attempting to accom

RE: UAG configuration for DA - I'm testing it now...

them just fine. With ping, use "ping -4 " or "ping -4 ". It's simply that IPv6 is used preferentially to IPv4. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 8:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: UAG configura

UAG configuration for DA - I'm testing it now...

I've finished configuration of DA/UAG, and am testing out a couple of laptops with it, from our guest wireless network. This was not a simple configuration, but I'm liking what I'm seeing so far. I must say, it's kinda weird to ping a server, and get back an IPv6 address

Re: Ping testing tool

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:21, David Lum wrote: > Anyone have a favorite free ping test tool? I am looking for pinging a few > hosts every 15 seconds and give me an up/down as well as response and > average over the last xx period of time. No alerting necessary. If you want to get fancy, try smok

RE: Ping testing tool

email:ezi...@lifespan.org phone:401-639-3505 From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping testing tool With PowerShell v2 you'd want to use Test-Connection PS:> test-connection -computername

RE: Ping testing tool

mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:23 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping testing tool With PowerShell v2 you'd want to use Test-Connection PS:> test-connection -computername server01, server02, server12 Of course, you'd have to build in the data c

Re: Ping testing tool

t; > *Gainesville, Fl 32607* > > *Office (352) 244-1610* > > *Cell (352) 215-6944* > > *MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP**4, VTSP4* > > ** ** > > *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:35 PM

RE: Ping testing tool

Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Ping testing tool This might be a good powershell project if you haven't gotten your hands dirty with it yet. On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:21 PM, David Lum mailto:david@nwe

Re: Ping testing tool

This might be a good powershell project if you haven't gotten your hands dirty with it yet. On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:21 PM, David Lum wrote: > Anyone have a favorite free ping test tool? I am looking for pinging a > few hosts every 15 seconds and give me an up/down as well as response and > a

Re: Ping testing tool

)wiscoind.com _ From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:21:45 -0600 Subject: Ping testing tool Anyone have a favorite free ping test tool? I am looking for pinging a few hosts every 15 seconds

Re: Testing...

got it. On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Shamika Fehr wrote: > Haha! Thanks! > > -- > *From:* "Ziots, Edward" > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Sent:* Mon, May 9, 2011 9:01:53 AM > *Subject:* RE: Testing... > > Bingo, Bo

Re: Testing...

Haha! Thanks! From: "Ziots, Edward" To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon, May 9, 2011 9:01:53 AM Subject: RE: Testing... Bingo, Bongo… Good copy over..   Roger, Out..   Z   Edward E. Ziots CISSP, Network +, Security + Security Engineer Lifespan Or

RE: Testing...

Admin Issues Subject: Testing... Is the list working? I haven't received anything since Friday, which is unusual. I don't comment often, but I do read the posts and from time to time I ask a questions. Thanks ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource

RE: Testing...

Workingcontinously.. From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Testing... Read you 5 by 5! On May 9, 2011 9:45 AM, "Shamika Fehr" wrote: > Is the list working? I haven't recei

Re: Testing...

Awesome! Got it! Must have been a slow weekend. :) From: Daniel Rodriguez To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon, May 9, 2011 8:46:25 AM Subject: Re: Testing... Read you 5 by 5! On May 9, 2011 9:45 AM, "Shamika Fehr" wrote: > Is the list worki

Re: Testing...

Read you 5 by 5! On May 9, 2011 9:45 AM, "Shamika Fehr" wrote: > Is the list working? I haven't received anything since Friday, which is unusual. > I don't comment often, but I do read the posts and from time to time I ask a > questions. > > > Thanks > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that

Testing...

Is the list working? I haven't received anything since Friday, which is unusual. I don't comment often, but I do read the posts and from time to time I ask a questions. Thanks ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: Clearwater, Florida usability testing

tp://www.lflus.com/tampabreeze/ > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:10 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Clearwater, Florida usability testing > > > > Thr

RE: Clearwater, Florida usability testing

testing Throw in airfare, hotel and a rental car and I'm there! I hear there's a nice place called The Breeze down there somewhere that would be good for a post-testing libation. On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Alex Eckelberry mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com>> wrote: Anyone in th

Re: Clearwater, Florida usability testing

Throw in airfare, hotel and a rental car and I'm there! I hear there's a nice place called The Breeze down there somewhere that would be good for a post-testing libation. On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Alex Eckelberry < al...@sunbelt-software.com> wrote: > Anyone in the

Stress testing XenApp servers

I have been trying to use EdgeSight For Load Testing v3.8 from Citrix to stress test my new XenApp 6 farm, but I am finding the product a bit on the flaky side (to say the least). Now I am not familiar with testing as a process so it is a bit of a steep learning curve, but does anyone possibly

RE: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation

Fax: (610) 650-5306 don.gu...@prufoxroach.com -Original Message- From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 5:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation It was added in the 2008

RE: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation

:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation Interesting, never tried that, will have to. Kudos, Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group 431 W. Lancaster Avenue Devon, PA 19333 Di

RE: Port testing

cember 01, 2010 12:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Port testing Oh hey...now that you mention it.. From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Port testing You realize TCP 53 and UDP 53 perform two

Re: Port testing

I'd use Microsoft's portqry or nmap. On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:06 PM, David Lum wrote: > W2K8 R2 server, how can I test for an open port on another machine? > Specifically I need to see if ServerA can talk to port xxx on ServerB. I > thought you could use telnet..but using it to check DNS when I t

RE: Port testing

: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Port testing W2K8 R2 server, how can I test for an open port on another machine? Specifically I need to see if ServerA can talk to port xxx on ServerB. I thought you could use telnet..but using it to check DNS when I type TELNET 53 I get could not open port, yet

RE: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation

-existent DCs in a testing situation Yeah, you're going to have to do it "manually", NTDSUTIL. Once you do this 2-3 times, it becomes second nature and isn't very time consuming. Just be careful and read your commands before entering them. :) Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information

RE: Port testing

Oh hey...now that you mention it.. From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Port testing You realize TCP 53 and UDP 53 perform two different tasks right? On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:06 AM, David Lum mailto:david

Re: Port testing

You realize TCP 53 and UDP 53 perform two different tasks right? On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:06 AM, David Lum wrote: > W2K8 R2 server, how can I test for an open port on another machine? > Specifically I need to see if ServerA can talk to port xxx on ServerB. I > thought you could use telnet..but

Port testing

W2K8 R2 server, how can I test for an open port on another machine? Specifically I need to see if ServerA can talk to port xxx on ServerB. I thought you could use telnet..but using it to check DNS when I type TELNET 53 I get could not open port, yet DNS resolution works. If I do the same from

Re: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation

he dcdiag tests. And stopping/re-starting the w32time service, so the DC would properly announce itself as a time source. Looks like I am good to start testing the Win2008 upgrade procedure. I'll make a snapshot, so I can revert back if need be, and so I can run the tests twice. ~ Finally, power

Re: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation

-- > From: Mike Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:53 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing > situation > > On 12/1/2010 9:44 AM, Don Guyer wrote: >> Yeah, you're going

RE: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation

eone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation On 12/1/2010 9:44 AM, Don Guyer wrote: > Yeah, you're going to have to do it "manually", NTDSUTIL.

Re: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation

t values when listing role > holders. Each VM is Win2003 R2, BTW, with SP2. Forest and domain levels > are Win2003. > > Before I upgrade the domains to Win2008, I need to remove the references > to the other DCs, which will never exist anymore in this isolated > testing environment.

Re: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation

On 12/1/2010 9:44 AM, Don Guyer wrote: > Yeah, you're going to have to do it "manually", NTDSUTIL. Once you do > this 2-3 times, it becomes second nature and isn't very time consuming. > > Just be careful and read your commands before entering them. > Heh. Actually ... I found that if you go in

RE: Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation

emoving non-existent DCs in a testing situation We're practicing upgrading our AD 2003 to 2008. We have a parent-child domain structure. We have a VM DC in each domain. So I made copies of one of each, and separated them onto an isolated subnet. Then I seized all the FSMO roles. All that is p

Best way of removing non-existent DCs in a testing situation

lated testing environment. And I was going to do it this way: "How to remove data in Active Directory after an unsuccessful domain controller demotion" - KB 216498 <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/216498> which shows you how to delete DCs using NTDSUTIL, and the "metadata clean

Re: Penetration Testing

n Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Mark Robinson wrote: > Hi there, > > > > Does anyone know of a good quality, free, network-layer penetration testing > tool? > > > > Many thanks > > > > Mark Robinson > IT Technical Support Analyst > The Chartered

RE: Penetration Testing

: Penetration Testing Metasploit is going to be the best free tool you can use to do pentesting around software vulnerabilities etc... Backtrack is a good free linux boot cd/image that has basically every major pentest tool on it should you want to do wireless testing etc... This is a good documented

RE: Penetration Testing

Metasploit is going to be the best free tool you can use to do pentesting around software vulnerabilities etc... Backtrack is a good free linux boot cd/image that has basically every major pentest tool on it should you want to do wireless testing etc... This is a good documented framework

Re: Penetration Testing

For a one time scan you might consider http://www.qualys.com and one of their trial offerings. Die dulci fruere! Roger Wright ___ On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Mark Robinson wrote: > Hi there, > > > > Does anyone know of a good quality, free, network-layer penetration

RE: Penetration Testing

Sectools.org is another good one... Z -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1:03 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Penetration Testing Oh - one other thing. You might wish to subscribe, however briefly, to the

RE: Penetration Testing

y, February 10, 2010 1:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Penetration Testing Nessus, OpenVAS and a whole host of other tools. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~

RE: Penetration Testing

Testing Nessus, OpenVAS and a whole host of other tools. On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 07:51, Mark Robinson wrote: > Hi there, > > > > Does anyone know of a good quality, free, network-layer penetration testing > tool? > > > > Many thanks > > > > Mark Rob

Re: Penetration Testing

d quality, free, network-layer penetration testing > tool? > > > > Many thanks > > > > Mark Robinson > IT Technical Support Analyst > The Chartered Institute of Purchasing & Supply > Tel: +44 (0) 1780 761526 Fax: +44 (0) 1780 751610 > www.cips.org > > &

Re: Penetration Testing

Nessus, OpenVAS and a whole host of other tools. On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 07:51, Mark Robinson wrote: > Hi there, > > > > Does anyone know of a good quality, free, network-layer penetration testing > tool? > > > > Many thanks > > > > Mark Robinson >

RE: Penetration Testing

I am UK-based yes, and I have the required authority to carry out testing!! Believe me if I didn't have to do it (PCI Compliancy) I wouldn't... Thanks From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 10 February 2010 16:36 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: P

Re: Penetration Testing

Does that apply in the UK? I think that is where the OP is fromour legislation is probably far more draconian :-) On 10 February 2010 16:25, Ziots, Edward wrote: > Question would be (why are you pen testing) do you have authorization to > do such tests. > > > > I think

RE: Penetration Testing

NO its not David J Z From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:05 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Penetration Testing Yeah, it's called a DMZ :-P David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222

RE: Penetration Testing

Yeah, it's called a DMZ :-P David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 From: Mark Robinson [mailto:mark.robin...@cips.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Penetration Testing Hi

Penetration Testing

Hi there, Does anyone know of a good quality, free, network-layer penetration testing tool? Many thanks Mark Robinson IT Technical Support Analyst The Chartered Institute of Purchasing & Supply Tel: +44 (0) 1780 761526 Fax: +44 (0) 1780 751610 www.cips.org <http://www.c

RE: SCSI non-destructive disk testing

t: Re: SCSI non-destructive disk testing The failed redundancy message almost certainly refers to a failed software mirror. On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:01 PM, John Aldrich wrote: FWIW, this is NOT a RAID drive. It was originally, but then the system crashed and we barely got the data back from o

RE: SCSI non-destructive disk testing

ry 09, 2010 1:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SCSI non-destructive disk testing FWIW, this is NOT a RAID drive. It was originally, but then the system crashed and we barely got the data back from one of the two drives and had to reload the data from the emergency "mirror."

Re: SCSI non-destructive disk testing

y, February 09, 2010 12:59 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: SCSI non-destructive disk testing > > No, nothing really in the log files…. The only thing in the system log that > gave me pause is this: dmboot: Volume Volume1 (C:) started in failed > redundancy mode. Not sure wh

RE: SCSI non-destructive disk testing

al Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SCSI non-destructive disk testing No, nothing really in the log files…. The only thing in the system log that gave me pause is this: dmboot: Volu

RE: SCSI non-destructive disk testing

Manager, Blueridge Carpet 706-276-2001, Ext. 2233 From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SCSI non-destructive disk testing Typically there are all kinds of nasty things in the system log if a drive is

Re: SCSI non-destructive disk testing

Typically there are all kinds of nasty things in the system log if a drive is failing. Anything there? I have used Hard Disk Sentinel to gain some visibility into drive issues in the past. YMMV. http://www.hdsentinel.com/ Good luck (and prepare now for disaster), RS On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12

SCSI non-destructive disk testing

I get an error trying to run Seatools to test my SCSI drive, even after installing .Net 2.0 and all the updates. Anyone got any suggestions for error checking software to see if the drive is having issues? O/S is Win2k Server. John-AldrichTile-Tools ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security th

RE: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system

Minidump on the way. Thanks, John Aldrich IT Manager, Blueridge Carpet 706-276-2001, Ext. 2233 From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system Please get

RE: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system

Issues Subject: RE: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system Please get some of the minidump files generated during these crashes, and make available to Brian or I for analysis. Also, is it possible to consider a slightly smaller logo/signature? Cheers Ken From: John Aldrich

RE: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system

To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system Do any of you know of the open-source app, Drive Fitness Test? I suppose I could also download "Prime95" to test the CPU and memory to see if there is an issue developing there. [John-Aldrich][

RE: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system

ebruary 09, 2010 9:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system Generic, "white box" system with an Intel motherboard. John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:02 AM

RE: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system

Generic, "white box" system with an Intel motherboard. John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:02 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system is this in a gene

Re: Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system

’ve > got a machine that keeps crashing and I’m beginning to suspect hardware > issues. What’s the best way to conduct non-destructive testing on the SCSI > drive in the machine? I need to keep the data and O/S, as it’s our time and > attendance server and I **really** don’t want to have t

Drive testing for SCSI drives in an active system

How does one test if a SCSI drive is failing in an active system? I've got a machine that keeps crashing and I'm beginning to suspect hardware issues. What's the best way to conduct non-destructive testing on the SCSI drive in the machine? I need to keep the data and O/S, as it

RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com From: "Steven M. Caesare" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Date: 20/11/2009 15:48 Subject: RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? Well wasn?t _THAT_ a convenient time for the drive to fail! -sc From: tony patton [mailto:tony.p

RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

Well wasn't _THAT_ a convenient time for the drive to fail! -sc From: tony patton [mailto:tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 10:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? I *thought* i needed the whole te

RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

dmin Issues" Date: 20/11/2009 15:06 Subject: RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? You mean shrink once it?s been carved out? Did you carve then that large to begin with for a reason? -sc From: tony patton [mailto:tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 20

RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

ilto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 10:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? Lord no. If I had the funds for that kind of setup, I'd have funds for my own PS5000! In between messages, your comment on Vmotion b

RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

You mean shrink once it's been carved out? Did you carve then that large to begin with for a reason? -sc From: tony patton [mailto:tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OpenFiler testing... any best prac

Re: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

r-openfiler > > > > Do you have a vMotion enabled home setup? If so, consider me envious. ) > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2009 9:54 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* R

RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

+1 on the envy. Regards Tony Patton Desktop Operations Cavan Ext 8078 Direct Dial 049 435 2878 email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com From: "Steven M. Caesare" To: "NT System Admin Issues" Date: 20/11/2009 14:57 Subject: RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

Re: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

whole terabyte. Regards Tony Patton Desktop Operations Cavan Ext 8078 Direct Dial 049 435 2878 email: tony.pat...@quinn-insurance.com From: Jonathan Link To: "NT System Admin Issues" Date: 20/11/2009 14:54 Subject: Re: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? That is good to know, I

RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

009 9:54 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: OpenFiler testing... any best practices? That is good to know, I'll keep it in mind as I begin developing my home environment... On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: So far I have them that way, simply because in te

Re: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

That is good to know, I'll keep it in mind as I begin developing my home environment... On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > So far I have them that way, simply because in testing that was the > easiest, and I don’t have a Virtual Center setup that allows

RE: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

So far I have them that way, simply because in testing that was the easiest, and I don't have a Virtual Center setup that allows for vMotion anyway L. However, I opted for OpenFiler over the easier-to-setup FreeNAS because recent reports suggest that vMotion on OpenFiler is now supp

Re: OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

at 9:16 AM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Doing some testing with OpenFiler for iSCSI SAN testing. > > > > I’m presenting LUN’s via GigE links to my ESXi boxen hosting Win2K3 and > Win2K8 VM’s. > > > > So far I’m pretty impressed… and the price is right for a home networ

OpenFiler testing... any best practices?

Doing some testing with OpenFiler for iSCSI SAN testing. I'm presenting LUN's via GigE links to my ESXi boxen hosting Win2K3 and Win2K8 VM's. So far I'm pretty impressed... and the price is right for a home network. Anybody played with it and/or have any pointers

Re: How to set up a private network on VMware ESX for testing purposes

ne: 610-807-6459 > Fax: 610-807-6003 > > -Original Message- > From: oozerd...@gmail.com [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:45 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: How to set up a private network on VMware ESX for testing > purposes

RE: How to set up a private network on VMware ESX for testing purposes

-807-6459 Fax: 610-807-6003 -Original Message- From: oozerd...@gmail.com [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: How to set up a private network on VMware ESX for testing purposes On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Re: How to set up a private network on VMware ESX for testing purposes

to make a private network (using a virtual switch, > >> attached to no physical NICs), and replicate my domains, and practice > >> the upgrade. And test anything else, as needed. > >> > >> So I took a clone of each of the DCs, and assigned them to this > >>

Re: How to set up a private network on VMware ESX for testing purposes

lse, as needed. >> >> So I took a clone of each of the DCs, and assigned them to this >> virtual switch. Changed their IP addresses to use something different >> than my production IP range. Both are DNS servers. So I'm testing, to >> see if everything is configured co

Re: How to set up a private network on VMware ESX for testing purposes

ched to no physical NICs), and replicate my domains, and practice > the upgrade. And test anything else, as needed. > > So I took a clone of each of the DCs, and assigned them to this > virtual switch. Changed their IP addresses to use something different > than my production IP ra

How to set up a private network on VMware ESX for testing purposes

replicate my domains, and practice the upgrade. And test anything else, as needed. So I took a clone of each of the DCs, and assigned them to this virtual switch. Changed their IP addresses to use something different than my production IP range. Both are DNS servers. So I'm testing, to see if every

RE: Real a/v Testing

but Vipre wouldn't even let me save the messages without putting them in my local quarantine. From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Real a/v Testing I've creat

Mail flow testing service

Hi, Can anyone recommend a mail flow testing service that will send emails to a mailbox, test that they are recieved, say every 30 mins or so, and then alert if one fails? Olly ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Busine

R: Real a/v Testing

Couple of hours GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org] Inviato: mercoledì 16 settembre 2009 21.26 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Real a/v Testing You could also do a fresh XP installation, hook it to the internet, and run

RE: Real a/v Testing

whitepages.com From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Real a/v Testing LOL -- ME2 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Richard Stovall wrote

Re: Real a/v Testing

ilto:rhw...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:52 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Real a/v Testing > > > > I've created a virtual machine and want to test VIPRE and perhaps another > a/v solution against real malware. > > > >

RE: Real a/v Testing

Here's another one: http://www.malwaredomains.com/ From: Richard Stovall Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:51 PM To: 'NT System Admin Issues' Subject: RE: Real a/v Testing http://freepcsecurity.co.uk/2009/01/16/list-of-known-malicious-sites/ Fro

RE: Real a/v Testing

Now you have a legit excuse... :-) From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Real a/v Testing Thanks, all. P0Rn sites, screensavers, warez, should give me some real tests

RE: Real a/v Testing

http://freepcsecurity.co.uk/2009/01/16/list-of-known-malicious-sites/ From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Real a/v Testing Thanks, all. P0Rn sites, screensavers, warez, should give me some

RE: Real a/v Testing

ROFLMAO‼ J John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Real a/v Testing They actually have pornography on the internet? _ From: Phil Guevara [mailto:pguev

Re: Real a/v Testing

Thanks, all. P0Rn sites, screensavers, warez, should give me some real tests. I thought there'd be a site like www.infectmenow.com but I didn't have access to it. Roger Wright ___ On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Roger Wright wrote: > I've created a virtual machine and want to test VIPRE

  1   2   >