Albert Strasheim wrote:
Hello all
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:numpy-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Oliphant
Sent: 08 June 2006 22:27
To: numpy-discussion
Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Array Protocol change for Python 2.6
...
I would like to eliminate
Tim Hochberg wrote:
Sasha wrote:
On 6/8/06, David M. Cooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
+0 for name change; I'm happy with it as an attribute.
My rule of thumb for choosing between an attribute and a method is
that attribute access should not create new objects.
Interesting
On 6/9/06, Travis Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... In NumPy this is not quite the rule followed.
Bascially attributes are used when getting or setting intrinsinc
properties of the array. Attributes are used for properties that are
important in defining what an array *is*. The flags
On 6/9/06, David M. Cooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This difference is so dramatic that I think a message is justified
(absent a proper logging framework). It's helpful to know that the
time is going into c++ compilation, and not your code hanging for 30
seconds.
Ok, I'll give you that
Andrew Straw wrote:
Christopher Barker wrote:
Joe Harrington wrote:
My
suggestion is that all the other pages be automatic redirects to the
scipy.org page or subpages thereof.
if that means something like:
www.numpy.scipy.org (or www.scipy.org/numpy )
Then I'm all for it.
I just
On Fri, 09 Jun 2006 16:03:32 -0700
Andrew Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Hochberg wrote:
Which of the following should we require for an object to be supporting
the array interface? Here a producer is something that supplies
array_struct or array_interface (where the latter is the
