Re: [Numpy-discussion] Need more comments from scientific community on python-dev

> > It seems to me that at the python level, there's not much reason to > > choose the dtypes proposal over ctypes. I disagree. I can see a point in unifying ctypes and dtypes but in my mindset they've got two different scopes. ctypes is an interface to the c language dtype is a data description

[Numpy-discussion] hearts.MY tammy rowdy

Interstate Highways numbers or.German rockers who big pals with? Openwfe convert in pdf a svg. Top Larrys work enjoying board is.Openwfe convert in pdf a svg. Laudio Jxxyy Kxxyy Lxxyy!Style pagesmost comply mos rarely is directly pages. Ends needs am generated specify location am.Video Conv

[Numpy-discussion] 企业有利

财务部/总经理： 　　 您好! 感谢您阅读本邮件，但愿对您的工作有所帮助！如果您对邮件不感兴趣，请恕打扰！ 　　我是上海索立实业有限公司，本公司现有各种发票可以优惠代开。（普通发票为0.8-2%，增值发票为6%-8%，海关缴款书为2-4%）。详细点数根据票额洽谈! 　　 注：普通发票包括运输、租赁、广告设计、建筑安装、其它服务、商品销售（电子产品、五金交电、仪表仪器、机械设备、塑胶制品、化工原料、医疗设备）……等所有行业发票。海关缴款书以海关代征税收，完全可以代替增值税发票。 　　本公司实力雄厚，与全国各大城市的各个行业的公司有发票业务联系。由于规模庞大，本公司完全可以依照

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numarray indexing problems with Python2.5 and 64-bit platforms

On 02/11/06, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see this as a major issue in numarray and poses in great danger the > intended support of PyTables for numarray that we planned for some time > (until end of 2007). It would be nice to know if the numarray crew would > be willing to addres

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numarray indexing problems with Python2.5 and 64-bit platforms

Here's a stab at a solution but I don't have easy access to 64-bit linux at the moment so it is untested. If someone is willing to test it (and/or fix it) I'll add it to the next numarray release. It should be noted that numarray is not 64-bit enabled (it compiles as a 32-bit program in term

[Numpy-discussion] Segfault in Python 2.5

Hi, I recently tried to upgrade to Python 2.5 (MacPython), and I am getting segfaults on some of my f2py wrapped fortran codes. I'm running OS X 10.4.8 (ppc), and this occurs for both numpy 1.0 and 1.0rc2 (the two versions I tried). Running with Python 2.4 does not give me this error. This

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy book

> generating such a PDF, with some color and formatting tweaks so that > it prints legibly on black and white as well as looking nice on > screen. This sounds promising. I actually have had problems printing the guide, every information box showed up completely black except for the emblem. On 11/

[Numpy-discussion] numarray indexing problems with Python2.5 and 64-bit platforms

Hi, I've detected that numarray (1.5.2) seems to be bitten by the change in Python 2.5 for indexes (http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/pep-353.html). In a Linux64 machine (using Python 2.5), I get this: >>> a=numarray.array([1,2,3]) >>> a[1:2] array([1, 2]) # ! However, both Numeric and numpy see

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy book

On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Daran Rife apparently wrote: > Once a user purchases the document, how does s/he obtain > the latest version, when it becomes available? In addition to providing updates on an "as requested" basis, Travis has made it clear that he will occasionally do a mass mailing. (At le

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy book

Hi Travis, I have one question about the fee-based "Guide to NumPy" that doesn't seem to be addressed on the Web site: or in the FAQ. Once a user purchases the document, how does s/he obtain the latest version, when it becomes available? Looking forw

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Reading records from file and sorting

George Sakkis wrote: >Charles R Harris wrote: > > > >>On 11/1/06, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>Albert Strasheim wrote: >>> >>> >>> Check the thread "Strange results when sorting array with fields" from about a week back. Travis made some changes to sorting

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Reading records from file and sorting

Charles R Harris wrote: > On 11/1/06, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Albert Strasheim wrote: > > > > > Check the thread "Strange results when sorting array with fields" from > > > about a week back. Travis made some changes to sorting in the presence > > > of fields that should s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Converting bool to float

Travis Oliphant wrote: > Robert Kern wrote: > > >> Tim Hochberg wrote: >> >> >> >>> Travis Oliphant wrote: >>> >>> >>> Robert Kern wrote: > Travis Oliphant wrote: > > > >> It looks like 1.0-x is doing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy book

On 11/2/06, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the pre-amble. Does it require pdflatex? I use ps2pdf > because to generate the shaded boxes and graphics. I could probably try > to do it with pdflatex and png files but I haven't tried, yet. I just tested it with ps2pdf on a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy book

Fernando Perez wrote: >On 11/2/06, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>Note that this is not a request to Travis to send me the latest version >>>by private email. That would be inefficient and my need is not that >>>urgent. Nevertheless I think that issue should be settled. >>> >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy book

On 11/2/06, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Note that this is not a request to Travis to send me the latest version > >by private email. That would be inefficient and my need is not that > >urgent. Nevertheless I think that issue should be settled. > > > > > There will be an update,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Argmax and max inconsistent for object types

Jonathan Wang wrote: > On numpy version 1.0, argmax and max give inconsistent results for an > array of objects. I've seen this problem in both Python native > datetime and mx.DateTime types: There is a bug in argmax for OBJECT arrays in 1.0 (it's fixed in SVN and will be in 1.0.1) -Travis

[Numpy-discussion] Argmax and max inconsistent for object types

On numpy version 1.0, argmax and max give inconsistent results for an array of objects. I've seen this problem in both Python native datetime and mx.DateTime types:In [22]: print nativeDates[datetime.datetime(2006, 10, 18, 10, 11, 27), datetime.datetime(2006, 10, 18, 10, 16, 20), datetime.datetime

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Converting bool to float

Robert Kern wrote: >Tim Hochberg wrote: > > >>Travis Oliphant wrote: >> >> >>>Robert Kern wrote: >>> >>> Travis Oliphant wrote: >It looks like 1.0-x is doing the right thing. > >The problem is 1.0*x for matrices is going to float64. For arrays it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy book

>Note that this is not a request to Travis to send me the latest version >by private email. That would be inefficient and my need is not that >urgent. Nevertheless I think that issue should be settled. > > There will be an update, soon. I'm currently working on the index, corrections, and forma

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Can' compile numpy 1.02rc3 on OSX 10.3.9

Hi! This, and similar problems with other programs were fixed when I installed 10.4 SDK from Apple Developer Conenction. Yes, the 10.4 SDK can be installed on 10.3.9. Regards Markus Am 19.10.2006 um 23:56 schrieb Markus Rosenstihl: > Hi! > I try to compile numpy rc3 on Panther and get followi

[Numpy-discussion] numpy book

Hi, now that 1.0 is out I would like to ask again about the status of the numpy ebook. Is there any mechanism in place where owners can get the updates? Note that this is not a request to Travis to send me the latest version by private email. That would be inefficient and my need is not that urgen

[Numpy-discussion] Warning: message 1GfAoO-0007im-Sh delayed 24 hours

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent has not yet been delivered to one or more of its recipients after more than 24 hours on the queue on externalmx-1.sourceforge.net. The message identifier is: 1GfAoO-0007im-Sh The subject of the message i