Travis,
A Dijous 27 Juliol 2006 18:22, Travis Oliphant va escriure:
I'm still looking for ideas on version numbering.
Right now, the trunk is at version 0.9.9 but this has bug-fixes from
the 1.0b1 release. The next release will be 1.0b2 and should occur in
about a week.
I don't really
Travis Oliphant wrote:
When 1.0 comes out, then the trunk will be
1.0.svn_version
Shouldn't the trunk then become:
1.1.0.svn_version or 1.1svn_version
That would signify a development version, which I understand is what the
trunk would then be. And it would be a greater version than the
On 7/27/06, Francesc Altet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Travis,
Speaking on what we regularly do, I would choose a 1.0b2.svn_version for the
trunk version. This is a way to say people: Hey, you are using a version
that will be the 1.0b2 in the future.. Of course, the same meaning can be
On 7/27/06, Andrew Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The one system that I
suggest we really try to work with out-of-the-box, however, is
setuptools, which, luckily, attached special meaning to .dev in a
release number, so that it sorts _before_ the release. (In setuptools
jargon, .dev is
To: Andrew Straw
Cc: Travis Oliphant; numpy-discussion
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Version numbers again
On 7/27/06, Andrew Straw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The one system that I
suggest we really try to work with out-of-the-box, however, is
setuptools, which, luckily, attached
