Re: [Numpy-discussion] users point of view and ufuncs

2006-08-25 Thread Robert Kern
Charles R Harris wrote: > Matrix rank has nothing to do with numpy rank. Numpy rank is simply the > number of indices required to address an element of an ndarray. I always > thought a better name for the Numpy rank would be dimensionality, but > like everything else one gets used to the numpy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] users point of view and ufuncs

2006-08-25 Thread Sebastian Haase
Sasha wrote: > On 8/25/06, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Matrix rank has nothing to do with numpy rank. Numpy rank is simply the >> number of indices required to address an element of an ndarray. I always >> thought a better name for the Numpy rank would be dimensionality, but like

Re: [Numpy-discussion] users point of view and ufuncs

2006-08-25 Thread Sasha
On 8/25/06, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matrix rank has nothing to do with numpy rank. Numpy rank is simply the > number of indices required to address an element of an ndarray. I always > thought a better name for the Numpy rank would be dimensionality, but like > everything else

Re: [Numpy-discussion] users point of view and ufuncs

2006-08-25 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi,On 8/25/06, Stefan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:10:24PM -0400, Sasha wrote:> I would welcome an effort to make the glossary more novice friendly,> but not at the expense of oversimplifying things.>> BTW, do you think "Rank ... (2) number of orthogonal dimens

Re: [Numpy-discussion] users point of view and ufuncs

2006-08-25 Thread Stefan van der Walt
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:10:24PM -0400, Sasha wrote: > I would welcome an effort to make the glossary more novice friendly, > but not at the expense of oversimplifying things. > > BTW, do you think "Rank ... (2) number of orthogonal dimensions of a > matrix" is clear? Considering that matrix is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] users point of view and ufuncs

2006-08-24 Thread Sasha
On 8/24/06, Bill Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > Hey Sasha. Your defnition may be more correct, but I have to confess > I don't understand it. > >"Universal function. Universal functions follow similar rules for > broadcasting, coercion and "element-wise operation"." > > What is "co

Re: [Numpy-discussion] users point of view and ufuncs

2006-08-24 Thread Bill Baxter
On 8/24/06, Sasha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/24/06, Bill Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >[snip] it would be > > nice to add a concise definition of "ufunc" to the numpy glossary: > > http://www.scipy.org/Numpy_Glossary. > > > > done > > > Can anyone come up with such a definition? > > I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] users point of view and ufuncs

2006-08-24 Thread Sasha
On 8/24/06, Bill Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[snip] it would be > nice to add a concise definition of "ufunc" to the numpy glossary: > http://www.scipy.org/Numpy_Glossary. > done > Can anyone come up with such a definition? I copied the definition from the old Numeric manual. > Here's m

Re: [Numpy-discussion] users point of view and ufuncs

2006-08-23 Thread Bill Baxter
On 8/24/06, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure what this question is asking, so I'll answer what I think> it is asking.>> The mean, min, max, and average functions are *not* ufuncs.   They are> methods of particular ufuncs. >Yes - that's what  wanted to hear !  I'm just tryin