Re: [Numpy-discussion] Splitting MaskedArray into a separate package

On 05/24/2018 11:31 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > I also somewhat like the idea of taking it out (once we have a first > replacement) in the case that we have a plan to do a better/lower level > replacement at a later point within numpy. > Removal generally has its merits, but if a (mid term) replac

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy sprint May 24-25 at BIDS

Hi Jaime, On Thu, 24 May 2018 10:01:40 -0700, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote: > I will be there tomorrow for sure, though. What time do you plan on > starting? Thanks for the heads-up. We'll probably start around 9:30am. We're at 190 Doe Library on Berkeley campus. We started today by discussin

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Citation for ndarray

Hi Nathan, On Thu, 24 May 2018 13:13:16 -0500, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > I see listed on the scipy.org site that the preferred citation for NumPy is > the "Guide to NumPy": > > https://www.scipy.org/citing.html > > This could work for what I'm writing, but I'd prefer to find a citation > specific

[Numpy-discussion] Citation for ndarray

Hi all, I see listed on the scipy.org site that the preferred citation for NumPy is the "Guide to NumPy": https://www.scipy.org/citing.html This could work for what I'm writing, but I'd prefer to find a citation specifically for NumPy's ndarray data structure. Does such a citation exist? Thanks

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy sprint May 24-25 at BIDS

I have had a last minute meeting scheduled for this afternoon, so I'm afraid I won't be able to make it today... I will be there tomorrow for sure, though. What time do you plan on starting? Jaime On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:31 AM Stephan Hoyer wrote: > I will also be attending, on at least Thu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Splitting MaskedArray into a separate package

I also somewhat like the idea of taking it out (once we have a first replacement) in the case that we have a plan to do a better/lower level replacement at a later point within numpy. Removal generally has its merits, but if a (mid term) replacement will come in any case, it would be nice to get th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Splitting MaskedArray into a separate package

On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 23:48 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 17:33 -0400, Allan Haldane wrote: > > If we do not plan to replace it within numpy, we need to discuss a > bit > how it might affect infrastructure (multiple implementations). > > There is the other discussion