Re: [Numpy-discussion] backwards compatibility and deprecation policy NEP

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> Speaking of examples: I hate to say this because in general I think > >> using examples is a great idea. But... I th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] backwards compatibility and deprecation policy NEP

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> Speaking of examples: I hate to say this because in general I think >> using examples is a great idea. But... I think you should delete most >> of these examples. The problem is scop

Re: [Numpy-discussion] backwards compatibility and deprecation policy NEP

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 12:28 PM Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> Then, I think it's not unreasonable to draw a couple of hard lines. For >> example, removing complete submodules like linalg or random has ended up on >> some draft brainstorm roa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

Hey Stefan/Ralf/Stephan, This looks nice, generally what the community agrees on. Great work, and thanks for putting this together. Best regards, Hameer Abbasi Sent from Astro for Mac On 24. Jul 2018 at 21:04, Stefan van der Walt wrote: Hi everyone, Please take a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] backwards compatibility and deprecation policy NEP

On 23. Jul 2018 at 19:46, Stephan Hoyer wrote: On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 6:40 PM Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > But I think the subclassing section is somewhat misleading in suggesting > `ndarray` is not well designed to be subclassed. At least, for neither my > work on

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

Stefan and Ralf -- thanks for finishing this up! I'm quite happy with the state of this. On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 1:17 PM Gael Varoquaux < gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: > Looks great! Thank you for doing this! > > Gaël > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:04:49PM -0700, Stefan van der Walt wrote

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

Looks great! Thank you for doing this! Gaël On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:04:49PM -0700, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please take a look at the latest roadmap proposal: > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11611 > This is a living document, so can easily be modified in the future,

[Numpy-discussion] Roadmap proposal, v3

Hi everyone, Please take a look at the latest roadmap proposal: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11611 This is a living document, so can easily be modified in the future, but we'd like to get in place a document that corresponds fairly closely with current community priorities. Best regards,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] backwards compatibility and deprecation policy NEP

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Rather, we might state that "At some point in the future, the NumPy >> development team may no longer interested in maintaining workarounds for >> specific subclasses, because other interfaces for extendi