On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Rather, we might state that "At some point in the future, the NumPy >> development team may no longer interested in maintaining workarounds for >> specific subclasses, because other interfaces for extending NumPy are >> believed to be more maintainable/preferred." >> >> That sentence I think covers it very well. Subclasses can and should be > expected to evolve along with numpy, and if that means some numpy-version > dependent parts, so be it (we have those now...). It is just that one > should not remove functionality without providing the better alternative! > Thanks for the input both, that makes sense. I'll try and rewrite the section along these lines. Cheers, Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
