Re: [Numpy-discussion] Taking back control of the #numpy irc channel

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > Hi, > > I idle in #scipy and have op in there. I’m happy start idling in #numpy > and be op if the community is willing to let me. > Thanks Nathan. Sounds useful. There's also a Gitter numpy channel. AFAIK few/none core devs are regularly

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Taking back control of the #numpy irc channel

Hi, I idle in #scipy and have op in there. I’m happy start idling in #numpy and be op if the community is willing to let me. I’m also in the process of getting ops for #matplotlib for similar spam-related reasons. I’d say all the scientific python IRC channels I’m in get a decent amount of traffic

[Numpy-discussion] Taking back control of the #numpy irc channel

Over the past few days spambots have been hitting freenode's IRC channels[0, 1]. It turns out the #numpy channel has no operator, so we cannot make the channel mode "|+q $~a"[2] - i.e. only registered freenode users can talk but anyone can listen. I was in touch with the freenode staff, they r

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

> > It's also key to note the specific phrasing -- it is *diversity* that is > honored, whereas we would (and do) welcome diverse individuals. > I'm afraid I miss your point. I understand that diversity is what is being honoured in the current CoC, and that is my central issue. My issue is not s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

> On August 4, 2018 00:23:44 Matthew Harrigan > wrote: > >> One concern I have is the phrase "explicitly honour" in "we explicitly >> honour diversity in: age, culture, ...". Honour is a curious word choice. >> honour is defined as, among >> other things