+1
Jarrod
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just seems a
>>> bigger surface ar
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey <
> p.e.creasey...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just seems a
>> bigger surface area to maintain. Personally I already assumed Scipy's
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> We are planning to drop 32-bit compatibility from the numpy macOS
> wheels.
+1 -- it really is time.
I note that python.org has finally gone 64 bit only -- at least for the
default download:
"""
For 3.7.0, we provide two binary installer
Hi,
Short version:
We are planning to drop 32-bit compatibility from the numpy macOS
wheels. This email is to ask for feedback.
Long version:
macOS has tooling to allow distribution of binaries that have objects
for more than one architecture. These are called "fat" binaries, and
they were us
