Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:15 PM Tyler Reddy wrote: > Could initially try just adding some "bonus" jobs (that are useful / nice, > but we can't afford to add to current CI load) as a trial maybe, and if > the free version or a deal / offer on better services proves more > expedient than what we cu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:33 PM Tyler Reddy wrote: > Hi Allan, > > That's pretty cool -- I should follow-up on the CI part of it! > It's quite nice to have access to more exotic hardware, but I'd recommend not to add anything to our CI setup that's not a fully hosted service that we control via

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

Hi Allan, That's pretty cool -- I should follow-up on the CI part of it! Tyler On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 20:18, Allan Haldane wrote: > On 09/12/2018 08:14 PM, Tyler Reddy wrote: > > Would also be cool to have native ppc64 arch in CI, but I checked > > briefly with IBM and no such integration exis

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On 09/12/2018 08:14 PM, Tyler Reddy wrote: Would also be cool to have native ppc64 arch in CI, but I checked briefly with IBM and no such integration exists with github as far as the contact knew. Hi Tyler, ppc64 CI is available through OSUOSL. Earlier this year I requested a ppc64be test se

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:30 PM Stanley Seibert wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:26 PM Stanley Seibert >> wrote: >> >>> If you go beyond the free tier, you can connect self-managed build >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:26 PM Stanley Seibert > wrote: > >> If you go beyond the free tier, you can connect self-managed build >> workers to the same system, but the build agent is written in C#, so I'm >> not sure how portable it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:26 PM Stanley Seibert wrote: > I just finished adding support to the Numba repo for Azure Pipelines: > > https://github.com/numba/numba/pull/3303 > > The "free for open source" tier is 10 concurrent jobs that can run up to > 60 minutes each (although the website says 30

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

Also, if anyone is curious what the CI interface looks like for the results of a finished build, here's the Numba build from that PR: https://dev.azure.com/numba/numba/_build/results?buildId=34&view=logs On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Stanley Seibert wrote: > I just finished adding support t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

I just finished adding support to the Numba repo for Azure Pipelines: https://github.com/numba/numba/pull/3303 The "free for open source" tier is 10 concurrent jobs that can run up to 60 minutes each (although the website says 30 minutes), and no limit on minutes per month. Like the other CI ser

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

Could initially try just adding some "bonus" jobs (that are useful / nice, but we can't afford to add to current CI load) as a trial maybe, and if the free version or a deal / offer on better services proves more expedient than what we currently have then progressively migrate if / as appropriate.

[Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

Hi All, We might want to take a look at testing/building on AZURE . Probably worth exploring, although it is hard to find all information. IIRC, we got an offer from Microsoft along these lines a couple of y

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: PyData/Sparse 0.4.1

= Announcing PyData/Sparse 0.4.1 = (Apologies for the cross-posting) Hi everyone, This is a performance, bug-fix and feature release. The changelog can be seen at https://sparse.pydata.org/en/latest/changelog.html Highlights include: Faux