On 20/9/19 6:25 am, Robert Kern wrote:
Well, we must because one's used by the legacy RandomState and one's
used by Generator. :-)
I would prefer not to create a legacy C-API at all. Are we required to
from the NEP?
Matti
___
NumPy-Discussio
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:04 PM Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:53 PM Robert Kern wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:24 AM Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:28 AM Kevin Sheppard <
>>> kevin.k.shepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
There are some u
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:53 PM Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:24 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:28 AM Kevin Sheppard <
>> kevin.k.shepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There are some users of the NumPy C code in randomkit. This was never
>>> officially
On 9/18/19, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> to try and make some progress towards a decision since the broad design
> is pretty much settling from my side. I am thinking about making a
> meeting, and suggest Monday at 11am Pacific Time (I am open to other
> times though).
That works for me.
On 19/9/19 2:34 am, Sebastian Berg wrote:
Hi all,
to try and make some progress towards a decision since the broad design
is pretty much settling from my side. I am thinking about making a
meeting, and suggest Monday at 11am Pacific Time (I am open to other
times though).
My hope is to get ever
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 21:33 -0700, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:35 PM Sebastian Berg <
> sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > to try and make some progress towards a decision since the broad
> > design
> > is pretty much settling from my s
Just to chime in: Numba would definitely appreciate C functions to access
the random distribution implementations, and have a side-project
(numba-scipy) that is making the Cython wrapped functions in SciPy visible
to Numba.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:41 AM Kevin Sheppard
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep
NEP 32 is available at
https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0032-remove-financial-functions.html
Recent timeline:
- 30-Aug-2019 - A pull request with NEP 32 submitted.
- 03-Sep-2019 - Announcement of the NEP 32 pull request on the
NumPy-Discussion mailing list, with the text of the NEP included in
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:24 AM Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:28 AM Kevin Sheppard <
> kevin.k.shepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There are some users of the NumPy C code in randomkit. This was never
>> officially supported. There has been a long open issue to provide this
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Should there be a prefix on the C functions?
>> 2. If so, what should the prefix be?
>>
>
Preferably, yes. Don't have an opinion on an exact prefix, as long as it
allows me to e.g. swap a normal distribution generator in my cython/c++
user code without too much mess.
if the only goal
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:23 AM Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:28 AM Kevin Sheppard <
> kevin.k.shepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There are some users of the NumPy C code in randomkit. This was never
>> officially supported. There has been a long open issue to provide this
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:28 AM Kevin Sheppard
wrote:
> There are some users of the NumPy C code in randomkit. This was never
> officially supported. There has been a long open issue to provide this
> officially.
>
> When I wrote randomgen I supplied .pdx files that make it simpler to write
>
There are some users of the NumPy C code in randomkit. This was never
officially supported. There has been a long open issue to provide this
officially.
When I wrote randomgen I supplied .pdx files that make it simpler to write
Cython code that uses the components. The lower-level API has not h
13 matches
Mail list logo