On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 6:54 AM Ganesh Rajora via NumPy-Discussion <
numpy-discussion@python.org> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am Ganesh working for an MNC here in India and I am working on
> customised Python where I build set of python modules with python.
>
> I do not install them directly from web
On 27/2/24 06:09, Ganesh Rajora via NumPy-Discussion wrote:
Hi Team,
I am Ganesh working for an MNC here in India and I am working on
customised Python where I build set of python modules with python.
I do not install them directly from web but I build each and
everything from source code.
Good day!
My name is Alexander Levin.
My colleague and I did a project on optimisation of two-dimensional Fourier
transform algorithm six months ago. We took your implementation of numpy fft2d
as a unit of quality.
In the course of our research we found out that initially mathematically the
Hi Team,
I am Ganesh working for an MNC here in India and I am working on customised
Python where I build set of python modules with python.
I do not install them directly from web but I build each and everything from
source code. this is because security concerns at the organisation.
In simi
Thanks Ralf,
This answers my question about the absence of I/O Numpy format.
There are three other points related to this format proposal:
- integration of a semantic level above the number / character formats as for
datetime (e.g. units, point / polygon, URI, email, IP, encoding...),
- neutra
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 12:34 AM wrote:
>
> > Perhaps, like the Pandas package, it should live outside NumPy for a
> > while until some wider consensus could emerge.
>
> Regarding this initial remark, this is indeed a possible option but it
> depends on the answer to the question:
>
> - does Nu
