On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Ilhan Polat wrote:
> A few months ago, I had the innocent intention to wrap LDLt decomposition
> routines of LAPACK into SciPy but then I am made aware that the minimum
> required version of LAPACK/BLAS was due to Accelerate framework. Since then
> I've been foll
If it can confuse you, imagine what would happen to regular users like me.
That's why I wanted to mention this in advance that this also needs some
sort of a "No this is not related to Anaconda Accelerate" disclaimer at
some place if need be.
___
NumPy-Di
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Ilhan Polat wrote:
>> Yet another twirl to the existing spaghetti
>>
>> https://www.continuum.io/blog/developer-blog/open-sourcing-anaconda-accelerate
>>
>
> Just to avoid some obvious confusion, An
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Ilhan Polat wrote:
> Yet another twirl to the existing spaghetti
>
> https://www.continuum.io/blog/developer-blog/open-sourcing-anaconda-accelerate
>
Just to avoid some obvious confusion, Anaconda Accelerate is nothing
to do with macOS Accelerate:
"""
Accel
Yet another twirl to the existing spaghetti
https://www.continuum.io/blog/developer-blog/open-sourcing-anaconda-accelerate
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Matthew Brett
> w
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Matthew Brett
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Nathaniel Smith wro
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
I updated the bit about OpenBLAS wheel with some more inf
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> I updated the bit about OpenBLAS wheel with some more information on
>>> the status of that work. It's not super impor
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> I updated the bit about OpenBLAS wheel with some more information on
>> the status of that work. It's not super important, but FYI.
>
> Maybe remove the bit (of my text) that you cro
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> I updated the bit about OpenBLAS wheel with some more information on
> the status of that work. It's not super important, but FYI.
Maybe remove the bit (of my text) that you crossed out, or removed the
strikethrough and qualify? At the mo
I updated the bit about OpenBLAS wheel with some more information on
the status of that work. It's not super important, but FYI.
I also want to disagree with this characterization of the
Accelerate/multiprocessing issue: "This problem was due to a bug in
multiprocessing and is fixed in Python 3.4
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Ilhan Polat wrote:
> Ouch, that's from 2012 :( I'll add this thread as a reference to the wiki
> list.
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Nathan Goldbaum
> wrote:
>>
>> See
>> https://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-August/063589.html
>> a
Ouch, that's from 2012 :( I'll add this thread as a reference to the wiki
list.
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Nathan Goldbaum
wrote:
> See https://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/
> 2012-August/063589.html and replies in that thread.
>
> Quote from an Apple engineer in that thread
See
https://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-August/063589.html
and replies in that thread.
Quote from an Apple engineer in that thread:
"For API outside of POSIX, including GCD and technologies like Accelerate,
we do not support usage on both sides of a fork(). For this reason amon
That's probably because I know nothing about the issue, is there any
reference I can read about?
But in general, please feel free populate new items in the wiki page.
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> I've been wishing we'd stop shipping Accelerate for years, because of
I've been wishing we'd stop shipping Accelerate for years, because of
how it breaks multiprocessing – that doesn't seem to be on your list
yet.
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Ilhan Polat wrote:
> A few months ago, I had the innocent intention to wrap LDLt decomposition
> routines of LAPACK into
A few months ago, I had the innocent intention to wrap LDLt decomposition
routines of LAPACK into SciPy but then I am made aware that the minimum
required version of LAPACK/BLAS was due to Accelerate framework. Since then
I've been following the core SciPy team and others' discussion on this
issue.
17 matches
Mail list logo
