Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal - change to OpenBLAS for Windows wheels

2017-09-25 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Makes sense to me. > > On Sep 25, 2017 05:54, "Matthew Brett" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I suggest we switch from ATLAS to OpenBLAS for our Windows wheels: >> >> * OpenBLAS is much faster, at least when Tony Kelman tested it last year >> [1];

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal - change to OpenBLAS for Windows wheels

2017-09-25 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Makes sense to me. On Sep 25, 2017 05:54, "Matthew Brett" wrote: > Hi, > > I suggest we switch from ATLAS to OpenBLAS for our Windows wheels: > > * OpenBLAS is much faster, at least when Tony Kelman tested it last year > [1]; > * We now have an automated Appveyor build for OpenBLAS [2, 3]; > * T

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal - change to OpenBLAS for Windows wheels

2017-09-25 Thread Olivier Grisel
+1 for the change. -- Olivier ​ ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

[Numpy-discussion] Proposal - change to OpenBLAS for Windows wheels

2017-09-25 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, I suggest we switch from ATLAS to OpenBLAS for our Windows wheels: * OpenBLAS is much faster, at least when Tony Kelman tested it last year [1]; * We now have an automated Appveyor build for OpenBLAS [2, 3]; * Tests are passing with 32-bit and 64-bit wheels [4]; * The next Scipy release will